Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30885201›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in arthroscopic repair for discoid lateral meniscus tears.

Wen-Li Dai, Hua Zhang, Ze-Ming Lin, Zhan-Jun Shi, Jian Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Biological augmentation of meniscal repair: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation does not result in more favourable outcomes in arthroscopic meniscal repair: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Biologic Augmentation of Isolated Meniscal Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Current Role of Biologics for Meniscus Injury and Treatment.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Li DaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Road, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Hua ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1 Yixueyuan Road, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Ze-Ming LinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Road, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Zhan-Jun ShiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Road, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Road, Guangzhou, 510515, China. wangjiansouthern@163.com.
Southern Medical University · CNChongqing Medical University · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

Science and Technology Support Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 2016E02062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic repair with or without platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for tears of the discoid lateral meniscus (DLM).

methodsTwenty-nine patients with DLM tears within a stable knee were arthroscopically treated with meniscal suture repair. Of those, 14 were augmented with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and 15 were performed without PRP augmentation. Patients were evaluated at baseline (the day before surgery) and then 12 and 24 months after the last injection. Evaluation included the Lysholm score, and Ikeuchi grade, Visual analogue score (VAS) for pain and failure rate. Failure was defined by patients developing symptoms of joint line pain, locking, swelling or requiring repeat arthroscopy.

resultsThere was no difference in the failure rate in the PRP group (1 of 14) compared with the non-PRP group (2 of 15) (P = 0.58). Statistically significant improvement in Lysholm score, Ikeuchi grade and VAS for pain was documented at the last follow-up compared with baseline in both PRP and non-PRP group. No significantly difference was found between the PRP group and non-PRP group on Lysholm score, Ikeuchi grade and VAS for pain at the last follow-up. In the univariate analysis of each variable, younger age (P = 0.036) and longer follow-up duration (P = 0.043) were statistically associated with a better function improvement. Whereas in multivariate analysis, only younger age (P = 0.004) was significantly associated with a better function improvement.

conclusionWith regard to clinical evaluations in arthroscopic repair for DLM tears, PRP group had similar effect in pain relief and functional improvement to non-PRP group at mid-term follow-up. Future larger prospective studies with a longer follow-up are needed to determine whether PRP should be used with DLM repair.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich PlasmaAdolescentAdultArthroscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMenisci, TibialMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTibial Meniscus InjuriesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30885201
PMCPMC6421692
OpenAlexW2939566149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.