Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30885199›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

The impact of travel time on colorectal cancer stage at diagnosis in a privately insured population.

Mesnad Alyabsi, Mary Charlton, Jane Meza, K M Monirul Islam, Amr Soliman, Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mesnad AlyabsiDepartment of Population Health Research, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, P.O. Box 3660, Riyadh, 11481, 1515, Saudi Arabia. alyabsime@ngha.med.sa.
Mary CharltonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, 145 N. Riverside Drive, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Jane MezaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, 984375 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-4395, USA.
K M Monirul IslamDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, 984395 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-4395, USA.
Amr SolimanCity University of New York School of Medicine, Community Health and Social Medicine, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
Shinobu Watanabe-GallowayDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Public Health, 984395 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-4395, USA.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USCity University of New York · USKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SAUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural residents are less likely to receive screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) than urban residents. However, the mechanisms underlying this disparity, especially among people aged 50-64 years old with private health insurance, are not well understood. We examined the impact of travel time on stage at CRC diagnosis.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska. Members of this private insurance company aged 50-64 years, diagnosed with CRC during the period 2012-2016, and continuously enrolled in the insurance plan for at least 6 months prior to CRC diagnosis, were selected for this study. Using Google Maps, we estimated patients' travel time from their home ZIP code to the ZIP code of their colonoscopy provider. Using logistic regression, we analyzed the association between stage at CRC diagnosis, travel time, use of preventive services (i.e., check-ups or counseling to prevent or detect illness at an early stage) and patient characteristics.

resultsA total of 307 subjects met the inclusion criteria. People who had not used preventive services 6 months prior to CRC diagnosis had 2.80 (95% CI, 1.00-7.90) times the odds of metastatic CRC compared to those who had used these services. No statistically significant association was found between travel time and metastatic CRC diagnosis (P = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01).

conclusionsThe fact that 13% of the study population presented with metastatic CRC suggests some noncompliance with preventive services such as screening guidelines. To increase screening uptake and reduce metastatic cases, employers should offer incentives for their employees to make use of preventive services such as CRC screening.

Indexed as

Neoplasm StagingTravelColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansInsurance, HealthLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePreventive Health ServicesRetrospective StudiesRural PopulationTime FactorsAccess to careColorectal cancerGeographyHealth services researchPrivate insurance

Identifiers

PMID30885199
PMCPMC6423832
OpenAlexW2940610646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.