ArticleBMC health services research2019
Healthcare ecosystems research in mental health: a scoping review of methods to describe the context of local care delivery.
Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Modelling the impact on a local mental health system of previously implemented care programs: the experience of assertive outreach teams in Bizkaia (Spain).Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2025Article
- Leadership and governance for integrating mental healthcare at the primary healthcare (PHC) level: A mixed methods study in Ghana.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Mental health service diversity and work disability: associations of mental health service system characteristics and mood disorder disability pensioning in Finland.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2024Article
- Assessing unConventional Evidence (ACE) tool: development and content of a tool to assess the strengths and limitations of 'unconventional' source materials.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- An effective approach to tackling complex health policy challenges. Using a clinical microsystems approach and rethinking codesign.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Clarifying terminology and definitions in education services for mental health users: A disambiguation study.PloS one · 2024Article
- The Integrated Atlas of Dementia Care in the Australian Capital Territory: A Collective Case Study of Local Service Provision.Health services insights · 2024Article
- Patterns of mental health services and mood disorder disability pensions: a standard comparison of Finland's three largest hospital districts.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Measuring the intensity of mental healthcare: development of the Mental Healthcare Intensity Scale (MHIS).BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Patterns of mental health care provision in urban areas: A comparative analysis for local policy in the ACT.PloS one · 2023Article
- Patient- and Community-Oriented Primary Care Approaches for Health in Rural, Remote and Resource-Dependent Places: Insights for Eco-Social Praxis.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- Using Geospatial Analysis to Inform Development of a Place-Based Integrated Care Initiative: The Healthy Homes and Neighbourhoods Experience.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- A Semiautomated Classification System for Producing Service Directories in Social and Health Care (DESDE-AND): Maturity Assessment Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Patterns of Mental Health Care in Remote Areas: Kimberley (Australia), Nunavik (Canada), and Lapland (Finland): Modèles de soins de santé mentale dans les régions éloignées: Kimberley (Australie), Nunavik (Canada) et Laponie (Finlande).Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2020Article
- Experts' perceptions on the use of visual analytics for complex mental healthcare planning: an exploratory study.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Building the foundation for comprehensive suicide prevention - based on intention and planning in a social-ecological context.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2019Article
- Standardized Systematic Description of Provision of Care for Multiple Sclerosis at a Local Level: A Demonstration Study.International journal of MS careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence from the context of local health ecosystems is highly relevant for research and policymaking to understand geographical variations in outcomes of health care delivery. In mental health systems, the analysis of context presents particular challenges related to their complexity and to methodological difficulties. Method guidelines and standard recommendations for conducting context analysis of local mental health care are urgently needed. This scoping study reviews current methods of context analysis in mental health systems to establish the parameters of research activity examining availability and capacity of care at the local level, and to identify any gaps in the literature.
methodsA scoping review based on a systematic search of key databases was conducted for the period 2005-2016. A systems dynamics/complexity approach was adopted, using a modified version of Tansella and Thornicroft's matrix model of mental health care as the conceptual framework for our analysis.
resultsThe lack of a specific terminology in the area meant that from 10,911 titles identified at the initial search, only 46 papers met inclusion criteria. Of these, 21 had serious methodological limitations. Fifteen papers did not use any kind of formal framework, and five of those did not describe their method. Units of analysis varied widely and across different levels of the system. Six instruments to describe service availability and capacity were identified, of which three had been psychometrically validated. A limitation was the exclusion of grey literature from the review. However, the imprecise nature of the terminology, and high number of initial results, makes the inclusion of grey literature not feasible.
conclusionWe identified that, in spite of its relevance, context studies in mental health services is a very limited research area. Few validated instruments are available. Methodological limitations in many papers mean that the particular challenges of mental health systems research such as system complexity, data availability and terminological variability are generally poorly addressed, presenting a barrier to valid system comparison. The modified Thornicroft and Tansella matrix and related ecological production of care model provide the main model for research within the area of health care ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.