Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30885169›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2019

Advance directives in France: do junior general practitioners want to improve their implementation and usage? A nationwide survey.

Sidonie Hubert, Sarah Wainschtein, Albane Hugues, Caroline Schimpf, Thècle Degroote, Kelly Tiercelet, Marc Tran, Cédric Bruel, Francois Philippart, REQUIEM group (REQUIEM: Research/Reflexion on End of life support QUality In Everyday Medical practice)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predictors of advance care planning in 11 high-income nations.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sidonie HubertInternal medicine Unit, Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Sarah WainschteinInternal medicine Unit, Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Albane HuguesInternal medicine Unit, Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Caroline SchimpfMedical and surgical intensive care unit, Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Thècle DegrooteMedical and surgical intensive care unit, Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Kelly TierceletMedical and surgical intensive care unit, Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Marc TranMedical and surgical intensive care unit, Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Cédric BruelMedical and surgical intensive care unit, Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Francois PhilippartMedical and surgical intensive care unit, Groupe hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France. fphilippart@hpsj.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7323-0742
REQUIEM group (REQUIEM: Research/Reflexion on End of life support QUality In Everyday Medical practice)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe doctor-patient relationship has evolved to respect "the autonomy and patients' rights". One of the cornerstones in such autonomy is the opportunity for patients to draw living wills, also known as advance directives (AD). However, information about AD available to patients remains scarce largely due to the lack of involvement of General practitioners for several reasons. The aim of our study was to evaluate current general practitioner residents' (GPR) behavior concerning their role in informing their patients about AD.

methodWe built a French nationwide survey from GPR class of 2012 to 2014.

resultsTwo thousand three hundred ten residents completed our survey (21.1% of the total population of GPR during the period). 89.8% declared their willingness to offer patients the opportunity of writing AD. When asked about the usefulness of AD, 73.6% of residents responded that these are a suitable help for patients, but 19.7% considered that AD are essentially geared towards frail patients. Among residents who want to inform patients about AD (n = 2075), 14.7% wanted to involve all patients. Only 20.5% thought that elderly people should be systematically informed about AD. When the question involves other frail people in various disease areas, information seems relevant for 60.1% of GPR considering patient with cancer or malignant hematologic disease and for 56.2% about patients affected by neurodegenerative disease. When considering the routine use of AD, 20.5% of GPR would take them into account only if they are in agreement with the patient's decision.

conclusionsThe results of the survey indicate that GPR would rather choose to decide who should be informed about AD, and when to take AD into account for ethical concerns.

Indexed as

Advance DirectivesAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingFranceGeneral PractitionersHealth Care SurveysHumansPatient RightsPersonal AutonomyPhysician-Patient RelationsAdvance directivesGeneral practitionerLiving willsMedical educationPatient autonomy

Identifiers

PMID30885169
PMCPMC6423804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.