Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30885158›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

A cluster-randomized multi-level intervention to increase latrine use and safe disposal of child feces in rural Odisha, India: the Sundara Grama research protocol.

Bethany A Caruso, Gloria D Sclar, Parimita Routray, Fiona Majorin, Corey Nagel, Thomas Clasen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03274245 (Implementing and Evaluating a Multi-Level Intervention to Increase Latrine Use and Safe Feces Disposal Among Latrine Owning Households in Rural Puri District, Odisha, India), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03274245 nacompletednot on this map

Implementing and Evaluating a Multi-Level Intervention to Increase Latrine Use and Safe Feces Disposal Among Latrine Owning Households in Rural Puri District, Odisha, India

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled11,722ConditionsLatrine UsageArmsIntervention Package, Qualitative Research
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Community Perceptions of a Multilevel Sanitation Behavior Change Intervention in Rural Odisha, India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bethany A CarusoDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. bcaruso@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9738-9857
Gloria D SclarDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Parimita RoutrayIndependent Consultant, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Fiona MajorinDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Corey NagelCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Thomas ClasenDepartment of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

3ie TW14.1006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite health benefits of sanitation, an estimated 12% of the global population practices open defecation, including an estimated 50% of the population of India. Current estimates, however, do not include households that own toilets but do not use them, suggesting that the actual number of people defecating in the open is underestimated. This protocol describes a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate an intervention specifically designed to increase latrine use, including the safe disposal of child feces, in rural Odisha, India.

methodsThe trial engages 66 villages in Puri district, 33 randomly allocated to receive the intervention and 33 to serve as controls. The primary outcome is latrine use and is recorded at baseline and endline for all members of all households that own latrines in all trial vilalges. Additional data on determinants of latrine use and safe child feces disposal are also collected to assess change based on the intervetntion. A process evaluation assesses the delivery of the intervention and qualiative research takes place in non-trial villages as well as post-endline in trial villages to help explain trial findings. DISCUSSION: This is one of four trials taking place simultaneously in rural India with latrine use as the primary outcome. All four studies use the same outcome to gerenate comparable data across sites that can serve the government of India. The trial in Odisha is unique in that it collects latrine use data from all potential users in all households that own latrines, enabling a thorough view of the sanitation situation and factors that influence use at the community level. That latrine use is collected via self-report is a limitation, however any bias in reporting should be the same across villages and not impact the overall assessment of intervention impact.

trial registrationThis trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03274245 .

Indexed as

Rural PopulationSafetySanitationChildDefecationFamily CharacteristicsFecesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMultilevel AnalysisQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRefuse DisposalResearch DesignBehavior changeMotivationsMulti-level interventionOpen defecationRisk perceptionsSanitationSocial normsTheory-based interventionToilet

Identifiers

PMID30885158
PMCPMC6423860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.