Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30885065›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2019

Evaluation on Short-Term Therapeutic Effect of 2 Porphyrin Photosensitizer-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy for Esophageal Cancer.

Huilong Liu, Yanfang Liu, Li Wang, Xinjian Ruan, Fei Wang, Dandan Xu, Jing Zhang, Xiaoyan Jia, Duanqi Liu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05174117 (A Phase III Randomized Controlled Study of the Effect of Different Light Doses on Adverse Outcomes of Swallowing in Esophageal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05174117 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Phase III Randomized Controlled Study of the Effect of Different Light Doses on Adverse Outcomes of Swallowing in Esophageal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and TechnologyRan2022 to 2023Enrolled57ConditionsEsophagus CancerArmssingle irradiation, Double irradiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huilong Liu1 Department of Oncology, The PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4643-8588
Yanfang Liu1 Department of Oncology, The PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li Wang1 Department of Oncology, The PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xinjian Ruan1 Department of Oncology, The PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fei Wang1 Department of Oncology, The PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dandan Xu1 Department of Oncology, The PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing Zhang1 Department of Oncology, The PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyan Jia1 Department of Oncology, The PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Duanqi Liu1 Department of Oncology, The PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
The Military General Hospital of Beijing PLA · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze and study the short-term therapeutic effects and main adverse effects of 2 Porphyrin photosensitizer-mediated photodynamic therapy for esophageal cancer.

methodsWe apply the hematoporphyrin derivative and hematoporphyrin injection produced by different manufacturers at different periods as photosensitizers in therapy of 79 esophageal cancer cases, with the administration dosage of 5 mg/kg and intravenous drip 24 hours before irradiation. We apply the gold vapor laser and semiconductor laser, respectively, as treatment light source, with the power density of 100 to 300 mW/cm

resultsThere were 47 patients in hematoporphyrin derivative group, including 3 (6.4%) patients with complete response, 31 (66.0%) patients with partial response, 10 (21.3%) patients with minor response, and 3 (6.4%) patients with no change. The dysphagia score was reduced from 2.53 (1.16) before treatment to 1.32 (1.20; P < .01) after treatment. There were 32 patients in the hematoporphyrin injection group, including 3 (9.4%) patients with complete response, 19 (59.4%) patients with partial response, 6 (18.8%) patients with minor response, and 4 (12.5%) patients with no change. The dysphagia score was reduced from 2.41 (1.13) before treatment to 1.18 (0.99; P < .01) after treatment. The dysphagia scores of 2 groups after treatment were significantly reduced compared to those before treatment. Both groups did not display serious adverse effect.

conclusionsTwo porphyrin photosensitizers in treatment of esophageal cancer at different clinical stages all had good effect with similar therapeutic effect, mild adverse effect, and good tolerance, which implies it is a preferable palliative therapy means.

Indexed as

HematoporphyrinsLaser TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPrognosisHematoporphyrinsPhotosensitizing Agentsdysphagiaesophageal cancerlaserphotodynamic therapyphotosensitizer

Identifiers

PMID30885065
PMCPMC6425523
OpenAlexW2993416913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.