Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30884920›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Autologous Platelet Concentrates in Treatment of Furcation Defects-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sourav Panda, Lorena Karanxha, Funda Goker, Anurag Satpathy, Silvio Taschieri, Luca Francetti, Abhaya Chandra Das, Manoj Kumar, Sital Panda, Massimo Del Fabbro

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Effect of concentrated growth factors in guided tissue regeneration for the treatment of mandibular molar furcation lesions].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sourav PandaDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan 20122, Italy. drsaurav87@gmail.com.
Lorena KaranxhaDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan 20122, Italy. lorikaranxha@gmail.com.
Funda GokerDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan 20122, Italy. fundagoker@yahoo.com.
Anurag SatpathyInstitute of Dental Science and SUM Hospital, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar 751003, India. dearanurag@gmail.com.
Silvio TaschieriDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan 20122, Italy. silviotaschieri@gmail.com.
Luca FrancettiDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan 20122, Italy. luca.francetti@unimi.it.
Abhaya Chandra DasInstitute of Dental Science and SUM Hospital, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar 751003, India. drabhaya2011@gmail.com.
Manoj KumarInstitute of Dental Science and SUM Hospital, Siksha O Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar 751003, India. manojkumar@soa.ac.in.
Sital PandaDepartment of Public Health, Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar 751003, India. drsheetalpanda@gmail.com.
Massimo Del FabbroDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan 20122, Italy. massimo.delfabbro@unimi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this review was to evaluate the adjunctive effect of autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) for the treatment of furcation defects, in terms of scientific quality of the clinical trials and regeneration parameters assessment.

methodsA systematic search was carried out in the electronic databases MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and EMBASE, together with hand searching of relevant journals. Two independent reviewers screened the articles yielded in the initial search and retrieved the full-text version of potentially eligible studies. Relevant data and outcomes were extracted from the included studies. Risk of bias assessment was also carried out. The outcome variables, relative to baseline and post-operative defect characteristics (probing pocket depth (PPD), horizontal and vertical clinical attachment loss (HCAL, VCAL), horizontal and vertical furcation depth (HFD, VFD) were considered for meta-analysis.

resultsTen randomized trials were included in this review. Only one study was judged at high risk of bias, while seven had a low risk, testifying to the good level of the evidence of this review. The meta-analysis showed a favorable effect regarding all outcome variables, for APCs used in adjunct to open flap debridement (

conclusionFor the treatment of furcation defects APCs may be beneficial as an adjunct to open flap debridement alone and bone grafting, while limited evidence of an effect of APCs when used in combination with GTR was found.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationBone TransplantationFurcation DefectsHumansPlatelet-Rich PlasmaWound Healingautologous platelet concentratesbone defectsbone graftingbone regenerationfurcation defectsperiodontal defectsperiodontal regenerationperiodontal surgeryplasma rich in growth factorsplatelet-rich fibrinplatelet-rich plasmatissue healing

Identifiers

PMID30884920
PMCPMC6470588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.