Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30884880›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Machine Learning Algorithms and Fault Detection for Improved Belief Function Based Decision Fusion in Wireless Sensor Networks.

Atia Javaid, Nadeem Javaid, Zahid Wadud, Tanzila Saba, Osama E Sheta, Muhammad Qaiser Saleem, Mohammad Eid Alzahrani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Atia JavaidDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. atiajavaid477@gmail.com.
Nadeem JavaidDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. nadeemjavaidqau@gmail.com.
Zahid WadudDepartment of Computer Systems Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan. zahidmufti@nwfpuet.edu.pk.
Tanzila SabaCollege of Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia. tsaba@psu.edu.sa.
Osama E ShetaCollege of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt. uelshata@zu.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0002-9467-9936
Muhammad Qaiser SaleemCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, Al Baha University, Al Baha 65525, Saudi Arabia. muhammad.qaiser.saleem@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1121-283X
Mohammad Eid AlzahraniCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, Al Baha University, Al Baha 65525, Saudi Arabia. meid@bu.edu.sa.
Al Baha University · SACOMSATS University Islamabad · PKPrince Sultan University · SAUniversity of Engineering and Technology Peshawar · PKZagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision fusion is used to fuse classification results and improve the classification accuracy in order to reduce the consumption of energy and bandwidth demand for data transmission. The decentralized classification fusion problem was the reason to use the belief function-based decision fusion approach in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). With the consideration of improving the belief function fusion approach, we have proposed four classification techniques, namely Enhanced K-Nearest Neighbor (EKNN), Enhanced Extreme Learning Machine (EELM), Enhanced Support Vector Machine (ESVM), and Enhanced Recurrent Extreme Learning Machine (ERELM). In addition, WSNs are prone to errors and faults because of their different software, hardware failures, and their deployment in diverse fields. Because of these challenges, efficient fault detection methods must be used to detect faults in a WSN in a timely manner. We have induced four types of faults: offset fault, gain fault, stuck-at fault, and out of bounds fault, and used enhanced classification methods to solve the sensor failure issues. Experimental results show that ERELM gave the first best result for the improvement of the belief function fusion approach. The other three proposed techniques ESVM, EELM, and EKNN provided the second, third, and fourth best results, respectively. The proposed enhanced classifiers are used for fault detection and are evaluated using three performance metrics, i.e., Detection Accuracy (DA), True Positive Rate (TPR), and Error Rate (ER). Simulations show that the proposed methods outperform the existing techniques and give better results for the belief function and fault detection in WSNs.

Indexed as

belief functionELMKNNmachine learning classifiersRELMSVMWireless Sensor Networks

Identifiers

PMID30884880
PMCPMC6471498
OpenAlexW2921074017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.