Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30884837›Full record

ReviewCancers2019

Cancer-Related Neuropathic Pain.

Helen L Edwards, Matthew R Mulvey, Michael I Bennett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Circadian Clock Component REV-ERB Is an Analgesic Target for Cancer-Induced Tactile Pain Hypersensitivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Comprehensive assessment of pain characteristics, quality of life, and pain management in cancer patients: a multi-center cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  15. Neuropathic Pain in Cancer: What Are the Current Guidelines?Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helen L EdwardsAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK. h.l.edwards@leeds.ac.uk.
Matthew R MulveyAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK. m.r.mulvey@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6357-3848
Michael I BennettAcademic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK. m.i.bennett@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8369-8349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropathic pain in cancer is common and debilitating. It is important to differentiate neuropathic pain from other cancer-related pains as it is associated with worse pain outcomes and requires different treatment strategies. This review summarises recent updates to pain classification, aetiology, pain assessment and current recommendations for treatment in patients with cancer-related neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

cancerneuropathic painpharmacotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30884837
PMCPMC6468770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.