Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30884006›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2019

Optimizing ablation duration using dormant conduction to reveal incomplete isolation with the second generation cryoballoon: A randomized controlled trial.

Fehmi Keçe, Marta de Riva, Yoshihisa Naruse, Reza Alizadeh Dehnavi, Adrianus P Wijnmaalen, Martin J Schalij, Katja Zeppenfeld, Serge A Trines

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Validation of a prediction model for early reconnection after cryoballoon ablation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fehmi KeçeDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5374-9336
Marta de RivaDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5878-6750
Yoshihisa NaruseDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9630-951X
Reza Alizadeh DehnaviDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Adrianus P WijnmaalenDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Martin J SchalijDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3767-5231
Katja ZeppenfeldDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7034-1017
Serge A TrinesDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7715-9536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEfficacy of cryoballoon ablation depends on balloon-tissue contact and ablation duration. Prolonged duration may increase extracardiac complications. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal additional ablation duration after acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

methodsConsecutive patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to three groups according to additional ablation duration (90, 120, or 150 seconds) after acute PVI (time-to-isolation). Primary outcome was reconnection/dormant conduction (DC) after a 30 minutes waiting period. If present, additional 240 seconds ablations were performed. Ablations without time-to-isolation <90 seconds, esophageal temperature <18°C or decreased phrenic nerve capture were aborted. Patients were followed with 24-hour Holter monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months.

resultsSeventy-five study patients (60 ± 11 years, 48 male) were included. Reconnection/DC per vein significantly decreased (22%, 6% and 4%) while aborted ablations remained stable (respectively 4, 5, and 7%) among the 90, 120, and 150 seconds groups. A shorter cryo-application time, longer time-to-isolation, higher balloon temperature and unsuccessful ablations predicted reconnection/DC. Freedom of atrial fibrillation was, respectively, 52, 56, and 72% in 90, 120, and 150 seconds groups ( P = 0.27), while repeated procedures significantly decreased from 36% to 4% ( P = 0.041) in the longer duration group compared to shorter duration group (150 seconds vs 90 seconds group). In multivariate Cox-regression only reconnection/DC predicted recurrence.

conclusionProlonging ablation duration after time-to-isolation significantly decreased reconnection/DC and repeated procedures, while recurrences and complications rates were similar. In a time-to-isolation approach, an additional ablation of 150 seconds ablation is the most appropriate.

Indexed as

Cardiac CathetersOperative TimeAction PotentialsAgedAtrial FibrillationCryosurgeryEquipment DesignFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesPulmonary VeinsRecurrenceatrial fibrillationcryoballoon ablationdormant conductionpulmonary vein isolationtime-to-isolation

Identifiers

PMID30884006
PMCPMC6850340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.