Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30883775›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2019

Investigation of surgical adhesives for vocal fold wound closure.

Lei Xi Chen, Maxence Coulombe, Francois Barthelat, Almoaidbellah Rammal, Luc Mongeau, Karen Kost

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Balancing hemostasis and function: the impact of hemostatic materials on voice and swallowing outcomes in nerve-preserved thyroidectomy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. High-Performance Dopamine-Based Supramolecular Bio-Adhesives.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei Xi ChenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8849-3844
Maxence CoulombeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Francois BarthelatDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Almoaidbellah RammalDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Luc MongeauDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Karen KostDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

Fluid Structure Interactions Within the Human LarynxR01DC005788 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI MONGEAU, LUC · 2003 to 2018
$6.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSurgical adhesives are increasingly used for vocal fold microsurgery to assist wound closure and reduce the risks of scar formation. Currently used vocal fold adhesives such as fibrin glue, however, have thus far not been found to promote wound closure or reduce scarring. The objectives of this study were to investigate the mechanical strength and the cytotoxicity of three commercially available adhesives (Glubran 2, GEM, Viareggio, Italy; BioGlue, CryoLife, Kennesaw, GA; and Tisseel, Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, IL) for vocal fold wound closure.

methodsShear and tension tests were performed on 150 porcine larynges. The cytotoxicity of the adhesives to immortalized human vocal fold fibroblasts was investigated using neutral red uptake assays.

resultsThe average shear adhesive strength for Tisseel, BioGlue, and Glubran 2 was 13.86 ± 5.03 kilopascal (kPa), 40.92 ± 17.94 kPa, and 68.79 ± 13.29 kPa, respectively. The tensile adhesive strength for Tisseel, BioGlue, and Glubran 2 was 10.70 ± 6.42 kPa, 34.27 ± 12.59 kPa, and 46.67 ± 12.13 kPa, respectively. The vocal fold cell viabilities in extracts of Tisseel, BioGlue, and Glubran 2 were 99.27%, 43.05%, and 1.79%, respectively.

conclusionThere was a clear tradeoff between adhesive strength and toxicity. The maximum failure strength in shear or tension of the three surgical adhesives ranked from strongest to the weakest was: 1) Glubran 2, 2) BioGlue, and 3) Tisseel. Tisseel was found to be the least toxic of the three adhesives, whereas Glubran 2 was the most toxic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:2139-2146, 2019.

Indexed as

Wound Closure TechniquesAnimalsCyanoacrylatesFibrin Tissue AdhesiveMicrosurgeryProteinsShear StrengthSwineTissue AdhesivesVocal CordsBio-glueCyanoacrylatesFibrin Tissue Adhesiveglubran 2ProteinsTissue AdhesivesSurgical adhesivesvocal folds

Identifiers

PMID30883775
PMCPMC6697575
OpenAlexW2922618000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.