Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30883657›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2019

Antenatal care and caesarean sections: trends and inequalities in four population-based birth cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, 1982-2015.

Aluisio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora, Bernardo L Horta, Fernando C Wehrmeister, Diego Bassani, Mariângela F Silveira, Leonardo P Santos, Cauane Blumenberg, Fernando C Barros, Pelotas Cohorts Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aluisio J D BarrosPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas Brazil.
Cesar G VictoraPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas Brazil.
Bernardo L HortaPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas Brazil.
Fernando C WehrmeisterPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas Brazil.
Diego BassaniCentre for Global Child Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mariângela F SilveiraPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas Brazil.
Leonardo P SantosPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas Brazil.
Cauane BlumenbergPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas Brazil.
Fernando C BarrosPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas Brazil.
Pelotas Cohorts Study Group
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Católica de Pelotas · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal care and correctly indicated caesarean section can positively impact on health outcomes of the mother and newborn. Our objective was to describe how coverage and inequalities for these interventions changed from 1982 to 2015 in Pelotas, Brazil.

methodsUsing perinatal data from the 1982, 1993, 2004 and 2015 Pelotas birth cohorts, we assessed antenatal care coverage and caesarean section rates over time. Antenatal care indicators included the median number of visits, the prevalence of mothers attending at least six visits and the proportion who started antenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy and attended at least six visits. We described these outcomes according to income quintiles and maternal skin colour, to identify inequalities. We described overall, private sector and public sector caesarean section rates. Differences in prevalence were tested using chi-square testing and median differences using Kruskal-Wallis testing.

resultsFrom 1982 to 2015, the median number of antenatal care visits and the prevalence of mothers attending at least six visits increased in all income quintiles and skin colour groups. Inequalities were reduced, but not eliminated. The overall proportion of caesarean births increased from 27.6% in 1982 to 65.1% in 2015, when 93.9% of the births in the private sector were by caesarean section. Absolute income-related inequalities in caesarean sections increased over time.

conclusionsSpecial attention should be given to the antenatal care of poor and Black women in order to reduce inequalities. The explosive increase in caesarean sections requires radical changes in delivery care policies, in order to reverse the current trend.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrazilCesarean SectionChildFemaleHumansIncomeLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPrenatal CareYoung Adultcaesarean sectioncohort studieshealthcare disparitiesPrenatal care

Identifiers

PMID30883657
PMCPMC6422067
OpenAlexW2921759220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.