ArticlePloS one2019
InDel markers: An extended marker resource for molecular breeding in chickpea.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expression of Concern: InDel markers: An extended marker resource for molecular breeding in chickpea.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Genetic diversity of the zigzag ladybird beetle, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (F.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) with its distribution in India and implications for biological control.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of novel InDel markers by whole-genome sequence comparison and genetic diversity assessment of Thailand rice blast fungus populations.Stress biology · 2025Article
- Complete chloroplast genomes of three Polygala species and indel marker development for identification of authentic polygalae radix (Polygala tenuifolia).Genes & genomics · 2025Article
- Identification of Insertion and Deletion (InDel) Markers for Chickpea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Insertions and Deletions: Computational Methods, Evolutionary Dynamics, and Biological Applications.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Review
- Genetic Diversity Analysis and Core Germplasm Construction ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of jujube and sour jujube gave insight into their difference in genetic diversity and suitable habitat.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide SNP and Indel Discovery in Abaca (Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
- Identification and characterization analysis of candidate genes controlling mushroom leaf development in Chinese kale by BSA-seq.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2023Article
- Development of Omni InDel and supporting database for maize.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Construction of a genetic linkage map and QTL mapping of fruit quality traits in guava (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Characterization of 'QTL-hotspot' introgression lines reveals physiological mechanisms and candidate genes associated with drought adaptation in chickpea.Journal of experimental botany · 2022Article
- Pipeline for developing polymorphic microsatellites in species without reference genomes.3 Biotech · 2022Article
- Genetic Augmentation of Legume Crops Using Genomic Resources and Genotyping Platforms for Nutritional Food Security.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Genetic diversity analysis and development of molecular markers for the identification of largemouth bass (Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chickpea is one of the most important food legumes that holds the key to meet rising global food and nutritional demand. In order to deploy molecular breeding approaches in crop improvement programs, user friendly and cost effective marker resources remain prerequisite. The advent of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology has resulted in the generation of several thousands of markers as part of several large scale genome sequencing and re-sequencing initiatives. Very recently, PCR based Insertion-deletions (InDels) are becoming a popular gel based genotyping solution because of their co-dominant, inexpensive, and highly polymorphic nature. With an objective to expand marker resources for genomics assisted breeding (GAB) in chickpea, whole genome re-sequencing data generated on five parental lines of one interspecific (ICC 4958 × PI 489777) and two intra-specific (ICC 283 × ICC 8261 and ICC 4958 × ICC 1882) mapping populations, were used for identification of InDels. A total of 231,658 InDels were identified using Dindel software with default parameters. Further, a total of 8,307 InDels with ≥20 bp size were selected for development of gel based markers, of which primers could be designed for 7,523 (90.56%) markers. On average, markers appeared at a frequency of 1,038 InDels/LG with a maximum number of markers on CaLG04 (1,952 InDels) and minimum on CaLG08 (360 InDels). In order to validate these InDels, a total of 423 primer pairs were randomly selected and tested on the selected parental lines. A high amplification rate of 80% was observed ranging from 46.06 to 58.01% polymorphism rate across parents on 3% agarose gel. This study clearly reflects the usefulness of available sequence data for the development of genome-wide InDels in chickpea that can further contribute and accelerate a wide range of genetic and molecular breeding activities in chickpea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.