Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30883575›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Complications of CT-guided lung biopsy with a non-coaxial semi-automated 18 gauge biopsy system: Frequency, severity and risk factors.

Amany Saad Elshafee, Annika Karch, Kristina I Ringe, Hoen-Oh Shin, Hans-Jürgen Raatschen, Nermin Yehia Soliman, Frank Wacker, Jens Vogel-Claussen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Analysis of Influencing Factors of Complications for CT-guided 
Percutaneous Lung Biopsy].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amany Saad ElshafeeInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6415-4146
Annika KarchInstitute for Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Kristina I RingeInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hoen-Oh ShinInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hans-Jürgen RaatschenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Nermin Yehia SolimanInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Frank WackerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Jens Vogel-ClaussenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEMansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate frequency and severity of complications after CT-guided lung biopsy using the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification, and to assess risk factors for overall and major complications. MATERIALS AND

methods311 consecutive biopsies with a non-coaxial semi-automated 18 gauge biopsy system were retrospectively evaluated. Complications after biopsy were classified into minor SIR1-2 and major SIR3-6. Studied risk factors for complications were patient-related (age, sex and underlying emphysema), lesion-related (size, location, morphologic characteristic, depth from the pleura and histopathology), and technique-related (patient position during procedure, thoracic wall thickness at needle path, procedure time length and number of procedural CT images, number of pleural passes, fissure penetration and needle-to-blood vessel angle). Data were analyzed using logistic and ordinal regression.

resultsComplications were pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage. The complications were minor SIR1-2 in 142 patients (45.6%), and major SIR3-4 in 25 patients (8%). SIR5-6 complications were not present. Emphysema, smaller deeply located lesion, increased puncture time length and number of procedural CT images, multiple pleural passes and fissure puncture were significant risk factors for complication severity in univariate analysis. Emphysema (OR = 8.8, p<0.001), lesion depth from the pleura (OR = 1.9 per cm, p<0.001), and fissure puncture (OR = 9.4, p = 0.01) were the independent factors for major complications in a multiple logistic regression model. No statistical difference of complication rates between the radiologists performing biopsies was observed.

conclusionsKnowledge about risk factors influencing complication severity is important for planning and performing CT-guided lung biopsies.

Indexed as

FemaleHemorrhageHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLungLung DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPneumothoraxPulmonary EmphysemaRadiography, InterventionalRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID30883575
PMCPMC6422294
OpenAlexW2922203218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.