ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2019
Distributive quality assurance and delivery of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy treatments amongst beam matched linear accelerators: A feasibility study.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accelerated and standardized commissioning of a robotic RadioSurgery system using a hybrid golden beam data model.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Planning and deploying a remote satellite radiotherapy unit: a practical guide for clinicians and health administrators.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Clinical evaluation of the golden beam data in the monaco treatment planning system for the harmony pro and infinity linear accelerators.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Evaluating Monaco 6.2.2 in complex radiotherapy across matched LINACs: improved MLC modelling and dose accuracy with virtual source model 2.0.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- 3D gamma analysis between treatment plans for nominally beam-matched medical linear accelerators using PyMedPhys.Precision radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams among beam-matched linacs: a three-institutional study.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- A method for selecting reference beam model of VMAT plans with three 6MV beam-matched linear accelerators during radiation oncology.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Matched linac stereotactic radiotherapy: An assessment of delivery similarity and distributive patient-specific quality assurance feasibility.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Golden beam data provided by linear accelerator manufacturers should be used in the commissioning of treatment planning systems.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2022Article
- Consistency of small-field dosimetry, on and off axis, in beam-matched linacs used for stereotactic radiosurgery.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBeam matching occurs on all linacs to some degree and when two are more are matched to each other, patients are able to be transferred between machines. Quality assurance of plans can also be performed "distributively" on any of the matched linacs. The degree to which machines are matched and how this translates to like delivery of plans has been the focus of a number of studies. This concept has not yet been explored for stereotactic techniques which require a higher degree of accuracy. This study proposes beam matching criteria which allows for the distributive delivery and quality assurance of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans.
methodTwo clinically relevant and complex volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) SBRT spine and lung plans were chosen as benchmarking cases. These were delivered on nine previously beam matched linacs with quality assurance performed through ArcCheck and film exposure in the sagittal plane. Measured doses were compared to their treatment planning system predictions through gamma analysis at a range of criteria.
resultsDespite differences in beam match parameters and variations in small fields, all nine linacs produced accurate deliveries with a tight deviation in the population sample. Pass rates were well above suggested tolerances at the recommended gamma criterion. Film was able to detect dose errors to a greater degree than ArcCheck.
conclusionDistributive quality assurance and delivery of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy treatments amongst beam matched linacs is certainly feasible provided the linacs are matched to a strict protocol like that suggested in this study and regular quality assurance is performed on the matched fleet. Distributive quality assurance and delivery of SBRT provides the possibility of efficiency gains for physicists as well as treatment staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.