ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2019
A murine model of cutaneous aspergillosis for evaluation of biomaterials-based local delivery therapies.
Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cutaneous fungal infection is a challenging condition to treat that primarily afflicts immunocompromised patients. Local antifungal therapy may permit the delivery of high concentrations of antifungals directly to wounds while minimizing systemic toxicities. However, the field currently lacks suitable in vivo models. Therefore, a large cutaneous wound was created in immunosuppressed mice and inoculated with Aspergillus fumigatus. We fabricated biodegradable polymer microparticles (MPs) that were capable of locally delivering antifungal and characterized in vitro release kinetics. We compared wound bed size, fungal burden, and histological presence of fungi in mice treated with antifungal-loaded MPs. Mice with a cutaneous defect but no infection, mice with infected cutaneous defect but no treatment, and infected mice treated with blank MPs were used as controls. Infection of large wounds inhibited healing and resulted in tissue invasion in an inoculum-dependent manner. MPs were capable of releasing antifungals at concentrations above A. fumigatus Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for at least 6 days. Wounds treated with MPs had significantly decreased size compared with no treatment (64.2% vs. 19.4% wound reduction, p = 0.002) and were not significantly different from uninfected controls (64.2% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.497). This murine model may serve to better understand cutaneous fungal infection and evaluate local biomaterials-based therapies. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 1867-1874, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.