Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30882796›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2019

Production of Pseudotyped Particles to Study Highly Pathogenic Coronaviruses in a Biosafety Level 2 Setting.

Jean K Millet, Tiffany Tang, Lakshmi Nathan, Javier A Jaimes, Hung-Lun Hsu, Susan Daniel, Gary R Whittaker

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Selective Control byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antiviral Effects of Secondary Metabolites fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jean K MilletDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University; INRA, Virologie et Immunologie Moléculaires.
Tiffany TangRobert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University.
Lakshmi NathanRobert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University.
Javier A JaimesDepartment of Microbiology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Cornell University.
Hung-Lun HsuRobert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University; Horae Gene Therapy Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Susan DanielRobert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University.
Gary R WhittakerDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University; gary.whittaker@cornell.edu.

Funding

Structural and Functional Analysis of the Coronavirus Spike Protein Fusion PeptideR01AI135270 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI DANIEL, SUSAN, WHITTAKER, GARY R · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
Spike protein cleavage-activation and emergence of coronaviruses with extended trR21AI111085 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI WHITTAKER, GARY R · 2014 to 2015
$419k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI135270NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI111085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protocol aims to generate coronavirus (CoV) spike (S) fusion protein pseudotyped particles with a murine leukemia virus (MLV) core and luciferase reporter, using a simple transfection procedure of the widely available HEK-293T cell line. Once formed and released from producer cells, these pseudovirions incorporate a luciferase reporter gene. Since they only contain the heterologous coronavirus spike protein on their surface, the particles behave like their native coronavirus counterparts for entry steps. As such, they are the excellent surrogates of native virions for studying viral entry into host cells. Upon successful entry and infection into target cells, the luciferase reporter gets integrated into the host cell genome and is expressed. Using a simple luciferase assay, transduced cells can be easily quantified. An important advantage of the procedure is that it can be performed in biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) facilities instead of BSL-3 facilities required for work with highly pathogenic coronaviruses such as Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Another benefit comes from its versatility as it can be applied to envelope proteins belonging to all three classes of viral fusion proteins, such as the class I influenza hemagglutinin (HA) and Ebola virus glycoprotein (GP), the class II Semliki forest virus E1 protein, or the class III vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein. A limitation of the methodology is that it can only recapitulate virus entry steps mediated by the envelope protein being investigated. For studying other viral life cycle steps, other methods are required. Examples of the many applications these pseudotype particles can be used in include investigation of host cell susceptibility and tropism and testing the effects of virus entry inhibitors to dissect viral entry pathways used.

Indexed as

Containment of BiohazardsAnimalsCoronavirusHEK293 CellsHumansMiceMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVirionVirus InternalizationSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID30882796
PMCPMC6677141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.