Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30882684›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

The impact of marital status on survival in patients with surgically treated colon cancer.

Ching-Chieh Yang, Li-Chin Cheng, Yu-Wei Lin, Shih-Chang Wang, Te-Min Ke, Chung-I Huang, Yu-Chieh Su, Ming-Hong Tai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterizing Cancer and Work Disparities Using Electronic Health Records.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of Primary Tumor Resection on Survival of Patients with Metastatic Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Population-Based, Propensity‑Matched Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  16. Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Survival Differences and Potential Geographic Determinants Among Men and Women in Utah.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ching-Chieh YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan.
Li-Chin ChengDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan.
Yu-Wei LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan.
Shih-Chang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan.
Te-Min KeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan.
Chung-I HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, E-Da Cancer Hospital.
Yu-Chieh SuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital.
Ming-Hong TaiInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between marital status and disease outcome in patients with surgically treated colon cancer. Between June 2010 and December 2015, a total of 925 patients with newly diagnosed colon cancer receiving curative resection were enrolled. The effect of marital status on 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method, and was compared by log-rank tests. A Cox regression model was used to find significant independent variables and determine whether marriage had a survival benefit in patients with colon cancer, using stratified analysis. Among these patients, 749 (80.9%) were married, and 176 (19.1%) were unmarried, including 42 (4.5%) never-married, 42 (4.5%) divorced/separated, and 93 (10.1%) widowed. There was no significant difference between the married and unmarried groups in cancer stage or adjuvant treatment. Married patients had better 5-year DSS compared with unmarried patients (69.1% vs 55.9%, P < .001). Uni- and multivariate analyses also indicated that unmarried patients had worse 5-year DSS after adjusting for various confounders (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.24-2.22). Further stratified analysis according to demographic variables revealed that unmarried status was a significant negative factor in patients with the following characteristics: age >65 years, female sex, well/moderately differentiated tumor, and advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage disease (III-IV). Thus, marriage has a protective effect, and contributes to better survival in patients with surgically treated colon cancer. Additional social support for unmarried colon cancer patients may lead to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMarital StatusMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID30882684
PMCPMC6426559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.