ArticleMedicine2019
Clinical relevance of alpha-fetoprotein in determining resection margin for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Impact of Surgical Margin in Hepatectomy on Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Association Between Multi-Laboratory Parameters Pre- and Post-Treatment and Pathological Features and Their Values in Clinical Decision in Primary Hepatic Carcinoma.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- Review
- Impact of Surgical Margin Width on Prognosis Following Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Varies on the Basis of Preoperative Alpha-Feto Protein and Tumor Burden Score.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Resection Margin Width Does Not Influence the Prognosis of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Anatomic Resection: A Real-World Study from China.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2023Article
- Recurrence Patterns After Hepatectomy With Very Narrow Resection Margins for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Risk Score Model for Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Role of Tumor Burden and Alpha-Fetoprotein.Cancers · 2021Article
- LINC00221 silencing prevents the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma through let-7a-5p-targeted inhibition of MMP11.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
- Value of alpha-fetoprotein in hepatocellular carcinoma.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with high recurrence rates. Adequate resection margin which is carried out by surgeons may reduce tumor recurrence. Nevertheless, the margin width remains controversial particularly in cirrhotic patients where optimal parenchymal preservation is necessary. This study aims to find a reference for proposing the resection margin when liver resection is planning.Totally, 534 patients who received liver resection for HCC were included. The clinical profiles of the patients, tumor characteristics and patients' survival were all collected. The patients were classified according to resection margin (<0.5 cm, 0.5-0.99 cm, and ≥1 cm) and preoperative α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (<15 ng/ml, 15-200 ng/ml, and >200 ng/ml), then survival was calculated.Most of the patients had hepatitis B (52.4%) and hepatitis C (24.0%) infection. Multivariate analysis showed that narrow resection margin (<0.5 cm) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.323, P = .024), high AFP level (≥15 ng/ml) (HR: 1.305, P = .039), major extent of resection (≥3 segments) (HR: 1.507, P = .034), and underlying cirrhosis (HR: 1.404, P = .009) were independent risk factors for disease-free survival. In further survival analysis, resection margin was not significant for disease-free survival if serum AFP levels were <15ng/ml. However, for the patients with AFP level between 15 and 200 ng/ml, resection margin ≥0.5 cm was significant to improve 5-year disease-free survival from 24.6 months to 38.7 months (P = .040). For the patients with AFP >200 ng/ml, resection margin had to be extended to ≥1 cm to improve 5-year disease-free survival from 33.9 months to 48.8 months (P = .012). When the patients meeting AFP <15 ng/ml with tumor-free margin, AFP between 15 and 200 ng/ml with margin ≥0.5 cm, and AFP level >200 ng/ml with margin ≥1 cm were compared, their survival rates were not different.Adequate resection margin can be guided by pre-operative AFP levels. Tumor-free margin is enough for patients with normal AFP level. A resection margin ≥0.5 cm is advised for the patients with AFP between 15 and 200 ng/ml, and ≥1 cm for the patients with AFP over 200 ng/ml.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.