Observational studyMedicine2019
Clinical classification and individualized design for the treatment of basicranial artery injuries.
Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intracranial Intradural Vascular Injury during Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of neurological surgery reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the principles of clinical classification and individualized treatment of basicranial artery injuries based on its anatomical correlation.The data of 172 patients with various types of basicranial artery injuries were retrospectively analyzed. Among these patients, 128 patients were male and 44 patients were female, and the average age of these patients was 28.3 years old. All patients underwent computed tomography, some patients underwent computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography, and all the diagnoses were confirmed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). According to anatomical correlation, the injuries were classified into 5 types: vascular wall injury (type I), intradural injury (type II), epidural injury (type III), sinus injury (type IV), and skull base bone injury (type V). Individualized treatment was adopted based on the different types and characteristics of injuries.The percentages of basicranial artery injuries were as follows: type I, 4.6%; type II, 5.8%; type III, 3.5%; type IV, 77.9%; and type V, 8.1%. All 172 patients underwent DSA to demonstrate the classification. The lesion elimination rate revealed by DSA was 99.4% immediately after the operation, 98.3% at 1 week after the operation, and 98.8% at 3 months after the operation. The follow-up after 6 months revealed that the percentage of patients in whom clinical symptoms or signs completely disappeared was 97.7%, the percentage of patients with limited eye movement or visual impairment was 1.2%, and the percentage of patients with mild limb dysfunction was 0.6%.Basicranial artery injuries can be classified into 5 types. Individualized design of embolization therapy based on different characteristics might be applicable for basicranial artery injuries treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.