Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30882482›Full record

Observational studyCritical care medicine2019

Comparison of Two Techniques to Measure Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients at Risk for Increased Intracranial Pressure.

Ashish Agrawal, Roger Cheng, Julin Tang, Debbie Y Madhok

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effects of head-down tilt on optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy subjects.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Optic nerve sheath diameter does not correlate with intracranial pressure in pediatric neurocritical care patients.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Effects of prone positioning with neck extension on intracranial pressure according to optic nerve sheath diameter measured using ultrasound in children.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  17. Optic nerve sheath diameter asymmetry in healthy subjects and patients with intracranial hypertension.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure: a Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashish AgrawalDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Roger ChengDepartment of Neurology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Julin TangDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Debbie Y MadhokDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
University of California, San Francisco · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001872 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COLLARD, HAROLD R, JACOBY, VANESSA · 2016 to 2025
$112.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIntracranial pressure over 20 mm Hg is associated with poor neurologic prognosis, but measuring intracranial pressure directly requires an invasive procedure. Dilation of the optic nerve sheath on axial ultrasound of the eye has been correlated with elevated intracranial pressure, but optimal cutoffs have been inconsistent possibly related to the measurement technique. A coronal technique has been studied on healthy volunteers but not on patients with high intracranial pressure. We compared two measurement techniques (axial and coronal) in patients with suspected high intracranial pressure due to trauma, bleeding, tumor, or infection.

designProspective blinded observational study.

settingTwo tertiary referral center ICUs. PATIENTS: Twenty adults admitted to the ICU at risk for increased intracranial pressure expected to receive invasive intracranial monitoring.

interventionsUltrasound measurements of the optic nerve sheath in axial and coronal views either averaged between eyes or the highest in either eye. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsCoronal measurements showed less variability between each eye than axial measurements (mean difference 0.5 mm vs 1 mm; p = 0.03) and were associated with high intracranial pressure at first measurement and over 24 hours (area under the receiver operating characteristic range 0.7-0.8). Mean and highest axial measurements showed improved association with first (area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.87-0.94) and highest intracranial pressure measurement (area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.89-0.96) within 24 hours. A cutoff of highest axial measurement in either eye greater than 6.2 mm or mean axial measurement between eyes of 5.6 mm had a sensitivity of 100% in predicting high intracranial pressure over the following 24 hours.

conclusionsThe highest axial measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in either eye is the most predictive of patients with high intracranial pressure in our population. This comparison of measurement techniques has not previously been described and should be further explored to set test cutoffs for ultrasound of the optic nerve sheath diameter.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveFemaleHumansIntracranial HypertensionMaleMiddle AgedOptic NerveProspective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveSingle-Blind MethodUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30882482
PMCPMC6522267
OpenAlexW2922737395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.