Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30882479›Full record

Trial reportCritical care medicine2019

Effect of Documenting Prognosis on the Information Provided to ICU Proxies: A Randomized Trial.

Alison E Turnbull, Margaret M Hayes, Roy G Brower, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Pragyashree Sharma Basyal, Douglas B White, J Randall Curtis, Dale M Needham

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02721810 nacompletednot on this map

Engaging Surrogates and Physicians to Ensure Concordant Critical Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled116ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsConsideration of 3-month functional prognosis
NCT04239209 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Intensivist Communication on Prognosis Interpretation by Family Members of Patients at High Risk for Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled302ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsIndirect - other patients, Indirect - physiology, Redirection, Direct communication
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Communication, Shared Decision-making and Goals of Care in the ICU through Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Strategies to effect change in the ICU.Current opinion in critical care · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alison E TurnbullOutcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Margaret M HayesDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Roy G BrowerDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Elizabeth ColantuoniOutcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Pragyashree Sharma BasyalOutcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Douglas B WhiteProgram on Ethics and Decision Making, The Clinical Research, Investigation, and System Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Randall CurtisDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Dale M NeedhamOutcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

Mentored Patient Oriented Research in Improving Surrogate Decision Making for Patients with Advanced Respiratory FailureK24HL148314 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Douglas B White · 2019 to 2026
$944k
Understanding Response Shift in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) survivorsK01HL141637 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TURNBULL, ALISON · 2018 to 2022
$853k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL141637NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL148314NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL129364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Critical Care Choosing Wisely Task Force recommends that intensivists offer patients at high risk for death or severe functional impairment the option of pursuing care focused on comfort. We tested the a priori hypothesis that intensivists who are prompted to document patient prognosis are more likely to disclose prognosis and offer comfort-focused care.

designRandomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02721810).

settingHigh-fidelity Simulation Center in Baltimore, MD.

participantsOne hundred sixteen intensivists from 17 states.

interventionAll intensivists reviewed a paper-based medical record for a hypothetical patient on ICU day 3 and answered four survey questions about the patient's medical management. Intensivists randomized to the intervention group answered three additional questions about patient prognosis. Thereafter, each intensivist participated in a standardized, video-recorded, simulated family meeting with an actor performing a standardized portrayal of the patient's daughter. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsTwo blinded intensivists reviewed deidentified written transcripts of all simulated family meetings. The primary outcome was the blinded reviewers' assessment that the intensivist had presented the option of care focused entirely on comfort. Secondary outcomes included disclosing risk of death. All outcomes were planned prior to data collection. Among the 63 intensivists randomized to the intervention, 50 (79%) expected the patient to die during the hospitalization and 58 (92%) expected the patient to have new functional impairments preventing independent living. Intensivists in the intervention versus control group were no more likely to offer the option of care focused on comfort (13% vs 13%; 95% CI, -13% to 12%; p = 1.0) but were more likely to inform the daughter that her father was sick enough to die (68% vs 43%; 95% CI, 5-44%; p = 0.01).

conclusionsDocumenting prognosis may help intensivists disclose prognosis to ICU proxies, but in isolation, it is unlikely to change the treatment options offered during initial family meetings.

Indexed as

DocumentationIntensive Care UnitsPatient ComfortTruth DisclosureAdultCommunicationCritical CareElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProfessional-Family RelationsPrognosisProxy

Identifiers

PMID30882479
PMCPMC6897298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.