Trial reportCritical care medicine2019
Effect of Documenting Prognosis on the Information Provided to ICU Proxies: A Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Engaging Surrogates and Physicians to Ensure Concordant Critical Care
The Effect of Intensivist Communication on Prognosis Interpretation by Family Members of Patients at High Risk for Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Randomized Trial
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Intensivist Communication in a Simulated Setting on Interpretation of Prognosis Among Family Members of Patients at High Risk of Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Actor feedback and rigorous monitoring: Essential quality assurance tools for testing behavioral interventions with simulation.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Responses to a Daughter's Question about Prognosis When the Patient Is Expected to Die: A Qualitative Analysis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2019Trial
- Promoting early goals of care conversations in the CICU with a surprise question-based EHR workflow.BMC palliative care · 2024Observational
- Communication, Shared Decision-making and Goals of Care in the ICU through Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of CRASH and IMPACT in predicting the outcome of 340 patients with traumatic brain injury.Translational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Examining the Role of Race in End-of-Life Care in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Observational Study.Palliative medicine reports · 2023Article
- Prognosticating Outcomes and Nudging Decisions with Electronic Records in the Intensive Care Unit Trial Protocol.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2021Article
- Physician Self-assessment of Shared Decision-making in Simulated Intensive Care Unit Family Meetings.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Intensivists' Religiosity and Perceived Conflict During a Simulated ICU Family Meeting.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2020Article
- Strategies to effect change in the ICU.Current opinion in critical care · 2019Review
- Aligning use of intensive care with patient values in the USA: past, present, and future.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe Critical Care Choosing Wisely Task Force recommends that intensivists offer patients at high risk for death or severe functional impairment the option of pursuing care focused on comfort. We tested the a priori hypothesis that intensivists who are prompted to document patient prognosis are more likely to disclose prognosis and offer comfort-focused care.
designRandomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02721810).
settingHigh-fidelity Simulation Center in Baltimore, MD.
participantsOne hundred sixteen intensivists from 17 states.
interventionAll intensivists reviewed a paper-based medical record for a hypothetical patient on ICU day 3 and answered four survey questions about the patient's medical management. Intensivists randomized to the intervention group answered three additional questions about patient prognosis. Thereafter, each intensivist participated in a standardized, video-recorded, simulated family meeting with an actor performing a standardized portrayal of the patient's daughter. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsTwo blinded intensivists reviewed deidentified written transcripts of all simulated family meetings. The primary outcome was the blinded reviewers' assessment that the intensivist had presented the option of care focused entirely on comfort. Secondary outcomes included disclosing risk of death. All outcomes were planned prior to data collection. Among the 63 intensivists randomized to the intervention, 50 (79%) expected the patient to die during the hospitalization and 58 (92%) expected the patient to have new functional impairments preventing independent living. Intensivists in the intervention versus control group were no more likely to offer the option of care focused on comfort (13% vs 13%; 95% CI, -13% to 12%; p = 1.0) but were more likely to inform the daughter that her father was sick enough to die (68% vs 43%; 95% CI, 5-44%; p = 0.01).
conclusionsDocumenting prognosis may help intensivists disclose prognosis to ICU proxies, but in isolation, it is unlikely to change the treatment options offered during initial family meetings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.