Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30882348›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Consolidation alters motor sequence-specific distributed representations.

Basile Pinsard, Arnaud Boutin, Ella Gabitov, Ovidiu Lungu, Habib Benali, Julien Doyon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Hippocampus Represents Information about Movements in Their Temporal Position in a Learned Motor Sequence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A sleep spindle framework for motor memory consolidation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Basile PinsardLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4391-3075
Arnaud BoutinFunctional Neuroimaging Unit, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-2626
Ella GabitovFunctional Neuroimaging Unit, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Ovidiu LunguFunctional Neuroimaging Unit, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Habib BenaliLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France.
Julien DoyonFunctional Neuroimaging Unit, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3788-4271

Funding

CIHR MOP 97830Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche PhD scholarshipSorbonne Université PhD study abroad grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies investigating the acquisition of sequential motor skills in humans have revealed learning-related functional reorganizations of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar motor systems accompanied with an initial hippocampal contribution. Yet, the functional significance of these activity-level changes remains ambiguous as they convey the evolution of both sequence-specific knowledge and unspecific task ability. Moreover, these changes do not specifically assess the occurrence of learning-related plasticity. To address these issues, we investigated local circuits tuning to sequence-specific information using multivariate distances between patterns evoked by consolidated or newly acquired motor sequences production. The results reveal that representations in dorsolateral striatum, prefrontal and secondary motor cortices are greater when executing consolidated sequences than untrained ones. By contrast, sequence representations in the hippocampus and dorsomedial striatum becomes less engaged. Our findings show, for the first time in humans, that complementary sequence-specific motor representations evolve distinctively during critical phases of skill acquisition and consolidation.

Indexed as

LearningNeuronal PlasticityAdolescentCorpus StriatumEfferent PathwaysFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor CortexNerve NetYoung Adultfunctional MRIhumanmemory consolidationmotor sequence learningmultivariate pattern analysisneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID30882348
PMCPMC6461441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.