Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30882347›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Behavioural and neural signatures of perceptual decision-making are modulated by pupil-linked arousal.

Jochem van Kempen, Gerard M Loughnane, Daniel P Newman, Simon P Kelly, Alexander Thiele, Redmond G O'Connell, Mark A Bellgrove

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Contribution of the Locus Ceruleus-Norepinephrine System to the Coupling between Pupil-Linked Arousal and Cortical State.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Target Selection Signals Causally Influence Human Perceptual Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jochem van KempenInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0211-9545
Gerard M LoughnaneSchool of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1961-5294
Daniel P NewmanMonash Institute for Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8240-1876
Simon P KellySchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9983-3595
Alexander ThieleInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4894-0213
Redmond G O'ConnellMonash Institute for Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6949-2793
Mark A BellgroveMonash Institute for Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-8349

Funding

Australian Research Council DP150100986Australian Research Council DP180102066Australian Research Council FT130101488Wellcome 093104Wellcome 93104Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timing and accuracy of perceptual decision-making is exquisitely sensitive to fluctuations in arousal. Although extensive research has highlighted the role of various neural processing stages in forming decisions, our understanding of how arousal impacts these processes remains limited. Here we isolated electrophysiological signatures of decision-making alongside signals reflecting target selection, attentional engagement and motor output and examined their modulation as a function of tonic and phasic arousal, indexed by baseline and task-evoked pupil diameter, respectively. Reaction times were shorter on trials with lower tonic, and higher phasic arousal. Additionally, these two pupil measures were predictive of a unique set of EEG signatures that together represent multiple information processing steps of decision-making. Finally, behavioural variability associated with fluctuations in tonic and phasic arousal, indicative of neuromodulators acting on multiple timescales, was mediated by its effects on the EEG markers of attentional engagement, sensory processing and the variability in decision processing.

Indexed as

ArousalDecision MakingPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAttentionElectroencephalographyHumansLocomotionPupilarousaldecision-makingEEGhumanneurosciencepupil diameter

Identifiers

PMID30882347
PMCPMC6450670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.