Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30882042›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2018

Nanosized food additives impact beneficial and pathogenic bacteria in the human gut: a simulated gastrointestinal study.

Svenja Siemer, Angelina Hahlbrock, Cecilia Vallet, David Julian McClements, Jan Balszuweit, Jens Voskuhl, Dominic Docter, Silja Wessler, Shirley K Knauer, Dana Westmeier and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Convergence of Nanotechnology and Bacteriotherapy for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Emerging Priorities for Microbiome Research.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Svenja SiemerDepartment of Nanobiomedicine/ENT, University Medical Center of Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Angelina HahlbrockDepartment of Nanobiomedicine/ENT, University Medical Center of Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Cecilia ValletDepartment of Molecular Biology II, Centre for Medical Biotechnology (ZMB), University Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 5, 45117 Essen, Germany.
David Julian McClementsDepartment of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Jan BalszuweitInstitute for Organic Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 5, 45117 Essen, Germany.
Jens VoskuhlInstitute for Organic Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 5, 45117 Essen, Germany.
Dominic DocterDepartment of Nanobiomedicine/ENT, University Medical Center of Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Silja WesslerDepartment of Microbiology, Paris-Lodron University of Salzburg, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Shirley K KnauerDepartment of Molecular Biology II, Centre for Medical Biotechnology (ZMB), University Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 5, 45117 Essen, Germany.
Dana WestmeierDepartment of Nanobiomedicine/ENT, University Medical Center of Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Roland H StauberDepartment of Nanobiomedicine/ENT, University Medical Center of Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USUniversity of Salzburg · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology provides the food industry with new ways to modulate various aspects of food. Hence, engineered nanoparticles (NPs) are increasingly added to food and beverage products as functional ingredients. However, the impact of engineered as well as naturally occurring NPs on both commensal and pathogenic microorganisms within the gastrointestinal tract (GI) is not fully understood. Here, well-defined synthetic NPs and bacterial models were used to probe nanoparticle-bacteria interactions, from analytical to in situ to in vitro. NP-bacteria complexation occurred most efficiently for small NPs, independent of their core material or surface charge, but could be reduced by NPs' steric surface modifications. Adsorption to bacteria could also be demonstrated for naturally occurring carbon NPs isolated from beer. Complex formation affected the (patho)biological behavior of both the NPs and bacteria, including their cellular uptake into epithelial cells and phagocytes, pathogenic signaling pathways, and NP-induced cell toxicity. NP-bacteria complex formation was concentration-dependently reduced when the NPs became coated with biomolecule coronas with sequential simulation of first oral uptake and then the GI. However, efficient NP adsorption was restored when the pH was sufficiently low, such as in simulating the conditions of the stomach. Collectively, NP binding to enteric bacteria may impact their (patho)biology, particularly in the stomach. Nanosized-food additives as well as naturally occurring NPs may be exploited to (rationally) shape the microbiome. The information contained in this article should facilitate a "safe by design" strategy for the development and application of engineered NPs as functional foods ingredients.

Identifiers

PMID30882042
PMCPMC6420113
OpenAlexW2901197854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.