Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30882023›Full record

ArticleFood ethics2018

Informed consent in veterinary medicine: Ethical implications for the profession and the animal 'patient'.

Vanessa Ashall, Kate Millar, Pru Hobson-West

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food ethics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Feminist Ethic of Care for the Veterinary Profession.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Animals, veterinarians and the sociology of diagnosis.Sociology of health & illness · 2020
    Review
  18. Readability of consent forms in veterinary clinical research.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2019
    Article
  19. Austrian Veterinarians' Attitudes to Euthanasia in Equine Practice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vanessa AshallCentre for Applied Bioethics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, UK.
Kate MillarCentre for Applied Bioethics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, UK.
Pru Hobson-WestCentre for Applied Bioethics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 100526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informed consent processes are a vital component of both human and veterinary medicine. Current practice encourages veterinarians to learn from insights in the human medical field about how best to achieve valid consent. However, drawing on published literature in veterinary and medical ethics, this paper identifies considerable differences between the

Identifiers

PMID30882023
PMCPMC6420111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.