Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30881906›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2019

Comparing the Effect of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine on Intraoperative Bleeding in Spine Surgery.

Farahzad Janatmakan, Sholeh Nesioonpour, Fatemeh Javaherforoosh Zadeh, Alireza Teimouri, Mahshid Vaziri

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Fentanyl versus Dexmedetomidine Infusion in Head and Neck Free Flap Surgery for Comparison of Hemodynamic Parameters and Anaesthetic Requirements: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Opioid Sparing Analgesics in Spine Surgery.Advances in orthopedics · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farahzad JanatmakanDepartment of Anesthesia, Pain Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Sholeh NesioonpourDepartment of Anesthesia, Pain Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Fatemeh Javaherforoosh ZadehDepartment of Anesthesia, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Alireza TeimouriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tehran Medical Science Branch, Islamic Azad University Tehran, Iran.
Mahshid VaziriDepartment of Anesthesia, Pain Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiscopathy is one of the most common spinal surgeries. Hemodynamic control is important in bleeding reduction during the surgery. Clonidine and dexmedetomidine both are α

objectivesIn this study, the effects of clonidine and dexmedetomidine were compared in bleeding reduction during spinal surgery.

methodsThis randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 120 patients aged 20 to 50 years with ASA class I or II, undergoing spinal surgery. Patients were randomly divided into three groups. Group C received oral clonidine 0.2 mg, 90 minutes before entering the room. Group D received dexmedetomidine 0.5 µ/kg 15 minutes before anesthesia induction and 0.25 µ/kg/h infusion during operation. Group P received placebo as the control group.

resultsThere was a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss in patients who received clonidine (289 ± 130) and dexmedetomidine (344 ± 145) compared to the control group (462 ± 15) (P < 0.05), with a more dramatic reduction in the clonidine group (P < 0. 001).

Indexed as

Blood LossClonidineDexmedetomidineHemodynamicSpine Surgery

Identifiers

PMID30881906
PMCPMC6408748
OpenAlexW2917318865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.