ArticlePeerJ2019
A systematic comparison of eight new plastome sequences from
Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026Article
- The chloroplast genome sequences of Ipomoea alba and I. obscura (Convolvulaceae): genome comparison and phylogenetic analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A locus-dependent mixed inheritance in the segmental allohexaploid sweetpotato (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Newly reported chloroplast genome of Sinosenecio albonervius Y. Liu & Q. E. Yang and comparative analyses with other Sinosenecio species.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Article
- Plastid phylogenomics and plastome evolution in the morning glory family (Convolvulaceae).Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- New plastomes of eight Ipomoea species and four putative hybrids from Eastern Amazon.PloS one · 2022Article
- Assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of Ipomoea chloroplast genomes provide insights into the parasitic characteristics of Cuscuta species.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam).BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Extremely low nucleotide diversity among thirty-six new chloroplast genome sequences fromPeerJ · 2021Article
- Insights into population structure of East African sweetpotato cultivars from hybrid assembly of chloroplast genomes.Gates open research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsEight chloroplast genomes were assembled using short DNA sequences generated by next-generation sequencing technology. By combining these chloroplast genomes with 32 other published
resultsThe eight newly sequenced chloroplast genomes ranged from 161,225 to 161,721 bp in length and displayed the typical circular quadripartite structure, consisting of a pair of inverted repeat (IR) regions (30,798-30,910 bp each) separated by a large single copy (LSC) region (87,575-88,004 bp) and a small single copy (SSC) region (12,018-12,051 bp). The average guanine-cytosine (GC) content was approximately 40.5% in the IR region, 36.1% in the LSC region, 32.2% in the SSC regions, and 37.5% in complete sequence for all the generated plastomes. The eight chloroplast genome sequences from this study included 80 protein-coding genes, four rRNAs (rrn23, rrn16, rrn5, and rrn4.5), and 37 tRNAs. The boundaries of single copy regions and IR regions were highly conserved in the eight chloroplast genomes. In
conclusionsThe chloroplast genome sequence and structure were highly conserved in the eight newly-sequenced
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.