Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30881694›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters2019

Prediction of cancer using customised fuzzy rough machine learning approaches.

Chinnaswamy Arunkumar, Srinivasan Ramakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chinnaswamy ArunkumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Engineering, Coimbatore, 641112, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2983-3201
Srinivasan RamakrishnanDepartment of Information Technology, Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology, Pollachi, 642003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Letter proposes a customised approach for attribute selection applied to the fuzzy rough quick reduct algorithm. The unbalanced data is balanced using synthetic minority oversampling technique. The huge dimensionality of the cancer data is reduced using a correlation-based filter. The dimensionality reduced balanced attribute gene subset is used to compute the final minimal reduct set using a customised fuzzy triangular norm operator on the fuzzy rough quick reduct algorithm. The customised fuzzy triangular norm operator is used with a Lukasiewicz fuzzy implicator to compute the fuzzy approximation. The customised operator selects the least number of informative feature genes from the dimensionality reduced datasets. Classification accuracy using leave-one-out cross validation of 94.85, 76.54, 98.11, and 99.13% is obtained using a customised function for Lukasiewicz triangular norm operator on leukemia, central nervous system, lung, and ovarian datasets, respectively. Performance analysis of the conventional fuzzy rough quick reduct and the proposed method are performed using parameters such as classification accuracy, precision, recall,

Indexed as

approximation theorycancercancer datacentral nervous systemchi-squared testcorrelation-based filterfuzzy approximationfuzzy rough machine learning approachesfuzzy rough quick reduct algorithmfuzzy set theoryfuzzy triangular norm operatorlearning (artificial intelligence)leukaemiaLukasiewicz fuzzy implicatorlungMatthew's correlation coefficientMcNemar testmedical computingovarian datasetspattern classificationrough set theorysampling methods

Identifiers

PMID30881694
PMCPMC6407447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.