Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30881539›Full record

ReviewThe western journal of emergency medicine2019

Machine Learning in Relation to Emergency Medicine Clinical and Operational Scenarios: An Overview.

Sangil Lee, Nicholas M Mohr, W Nicholas Street, Prakash Nadkarni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hierarchical Poincaré analysis for anaesthesia monitoring.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Predicting outcome for ambulance patients with dyspnea: a prospective cohort study.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sangil LeeUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
Nicholas M MohrUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Anesthesia and Critical Care, Iowa City, Iowa.
W Nicholas StreetUniversity of Iowa Tippie College of Business, Department of Management Sciences, Iowa City, Iowa.
Prakash NadkarniUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health informatics is a vital technology that holds great promise in the healthcare setting. We describe two prominent health informatics tools relevant to emergency care, as well as the historical background and the current state of informatics. We also identify recent research findings and practice changes. The recent advances in machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) are a prominent development in health informatics overall and relevant in emergency medicine (EM). A basic comprehension of machine-learning algorithms is the key to understand the recent usage of artificial intelligence in healthcare. We are using NLP more in clinical use for documentation. NLP has started to be used in research to identify clinically important diseases and conditions. Health informatics has the potential to benefit both healthcare providers and patients. We cover two powerful tools from health informatics for EM clinicians and researchers by describing the previous successes and challenges and conclude with their implications to emergency care.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDocumentationEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency MedicineHumansMachine LearningMedical InformaticsNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID30881539
PMCPMC6404711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.