ArticleAdvances in pharmacological sciences2019
Analysis of
Article in Advances in pharmacological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- HAp/PLGA/Chitosan Scaffolds Fabricated by Freeze-Drying and 3D Printing for Bone Regeneration: In Vitro Evaluation and Finite Element Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A rapidly fabricated bone marrow enrichment material with a controllable pore size promotes osteogenesis close to autogenous bone graft in clinic.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Fabrication and characterization of biodegradable Zn-Ni spinel ferrite/ β-TCP composite ceramics exhibiting enhanced cell colonization.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Calcium Phosphates for Bone Tissue Regeneration-Influence of Synthesis Method on Physicochemical and Biological Properties.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Focal Adhesion of Collagen-Based Bone Grafting Materials Enhances Bone Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Drug Loaded 3D-Printed Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Scaffolds for Local Antibacterial or Anti-Inflammatory Treatment in Bone Regeneration.Polymers · 2023Article
- Viability and Adhesion of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts on a Hydroxyapatite Scaffold Combined with Collagen, Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer and Platelet-Rich Fibrin: A Preclinical Pilot Study.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- Review
- Bone Morphogenic Protein 2-Loaded Porous Silicon Carriers for Osteoinductive Implants.Pharmaceutics · 2019Article
- Elaboration and Biocompatibility of an Eggshell-Derived Hydroxyapatite Material Modified with Si/PLGA for Bone Regeneration in Dentistry.International journal of dentistry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the main focuses of tissue engineering is to search for tridimensional scaffold materials, complying with nature's properties for tissue regeneration. Determining material biocompatibility is a fundamental step in considering its use. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze osteoblast cell adhesion and viability on different materials to determine which was more compatible for future bone regeneration. Tridimensional structures were fabricated with hydroxyapatite, collagen, and porous silica. The bovine bone was used as material control. Biocompatibility was determined by seeding primary osteoblasts on each tridimensional structure. Cellular morphology was assessed by SEM and viability through confocal microscopy. Osteoblast colonization was observed on all evaluated materials' surface, revealing they did not elicit osteoblast cytotoxicity. Analyses of four different materials studied with diverse compositions and characteristics showed that adhesiveness was best seen for HA and viability for collagen. In general, the results of this investigation suggest these materials can be used in combination, as scaffolds intended for bone regeneration in dental and medical fields.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.