Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30881407›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Comparison of Caffeine versus Theophylline for apnea of prematurity.

Arif Zulqarnain, Muddasser Hussain, Khalid Munir Suleri, Zafar Ali Ch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methylxanthine for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Arif ZulqarnainDr. Arif Zulqarnain, MBBS FCPS. Department of Pediatrics, Medicine Govt. Khawaja Muhammad Safdar Medical College & Govt. Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital, Sialkot, Pakistan.
Muddasser HussainDr. Muddasser Hussain, MBBS, FCPS. Department of Pediatrics, Medicine Govt. Khawaja Muhammad Safdar Medical College & Govt. Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital, Sialkot, Pakistan.
Khalid Munir SuleriDr. Khalid MunirSuleri, MBBS, BSC, DCH. Department of Pediatrics, Suleri Children and General Hospital, Sialkot, Pakistan.
Zafar Ali ChDr. Zafar Ali Ch., MBBS, FCPS, FRCS. Department of Pediatrics, Medicine Govt. Khawaja Muhammad Safdar Medical College & Govt. Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital, Sialkot, Pakistan.
University of Management and Technology · PKAllama Iqbal Medical College · PKAngkor Hospital for Children · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo make a comparison between standard doses of theophylline and caffeine for the treatment of apnea of prematurity.

methodsA randomised control trail was conducted in Department of Pediatrics Medicine Govt. Khawaja Muhammad Safdar Medical College and Govt. Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital, Sialkot over duration of one year from August 2017 to August 2018 after approval from the hospital ethics committee. An informed consent in the form of written document was also taken from the parents of each infant participating in the study. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 24. Mean and SD was calculated for numerical data like gestational age and mean concentration of caffeine and theophylline. Frequency and percentages were calculated for categorical data like nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), supplemental oxyen and intrventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade I. Student t-test was applied in order to determine the significance of results. P value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsA total of 100 infants were enrolled in this study. This study was further divided into two equal groups by lottery method i.e. 50% in each, treated with Theophylline and Caffeine respectively. Mean apnea events/day in neonates administrated by theophylline was 1±0.1, 2±0.12, 2±1.1, 1±0.10 and 2±o.12 for 0, 1-3, 4-7, 8-14 and 15-21 days respectively. While, the mean apnea events/day in neonates administrated by Caffeine was 2±0.3, 1±0.22, 2±1.5, 1±0.13 and 2±0.14 for 0, 1-3, 4-7, 8-14 and 15-21 days respectively. The differences were statistically significant for 1-3 days and 4-7 days p<0.05 according to student t test.

conclusionResults of our study revealed that caffeine being more effective than Theophylline for treating apnea of prematurity.

Indexed as

ApneaCaffeineInfantsPrematurityTheophylline

Identifiers

PMID30881407
PMCPMC6408648
OpenAlexW2910308657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.