Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30881391›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences

Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness between normal population and patients with diabetes mellitus using optical coherence tomography.

Mohammad Asim Mehboob, Zulfiqar Ali Amin, Qamar Ul Islam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad Asim MehboobDr. Mohammad Asim Mehboob, FCPS (Ophth), FICO, MRCSEd (Ophth), Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Gujranwala, Gujranwala, Pakistan.
Zulfiqar Ali AminDr. Zulfiqar Ali Amin, FCPS(Med), FCPS (Oncology), Associate Professor, PNS Shifa Naval Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Qamar Ul IslamDr. Qamar Ul Islam, FCPS (Ophthalmology), FCPS (Vitreo-retinal Ophthalmology), Associate Professor, PNS Shifa Naval Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
GIFT University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the difference in peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) thickness between normal population and Type-II diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD OCT).

methodsThis cross sectional study was carried out at PNS Shifa Naval Hospital, from May 2017 to November 2017. Out of 200 eyes, 100 eyes were of normal individuals and 100 eyes were of Type-II diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy. Both groups were age and gender matched. Average RNFL thickness, along with RNFL of each quadrant of individuals was noted using SD OCT, and compared between two groups.

resultsMean age of study population was 44.63 ± 4.30 years. Mean axial length was 23.46 ± 0.59 mm. Mean peripapillary RNFL thickness was 126.98 ± 10.07 µm in Group-A (normal individuals), and 120.77 ± 5.41 µm in Group-B (Type-II diabetics). Difference in mean RNFL thickness, as well as RNFL thicknesses of each quadrant was statistically significant between both groups (p-value < 0.001).

conclusionDiabetic patients have thin RNFL as compared to normal individuals, and must be taken in account while making diagnosis of any disease based on thinning of RNFL.

Indexed as

Diabetic neuropathyOptical coherence tomographyRetinal nerve fibre layer thickness

Identifiers

PMID30881391
PMCPMC6408645
OpenAlexW2910036836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.