Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30881236›Full record

ReviewIntegrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.)2017

Treatments for Inflammatory Arthritis: Potential But Unproven Role of Topical Copaiba.

Patricia Hebert, E Joan Barice, Juyoung Park, Susan MacLeod Dyess, Ruth McCaffrey, Charles H Hennekens

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Akt3 Regulates the Tissue-Specific Response to Copaiba Essential Oil.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patricia Hebert
E Joan Barice
Juyoung Park
Susan MacLeod Dyess
Ruth McCaffrey
Charles H Hennekens

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional medicines for inflammatory arthritis (IA) include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (COXIBs), which have variable clinical benefits and serious side effects. In large-scale randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) in IA, they have demonstrated significant decreases in pain and inflammation but also significant increases in gastrointestinal symptoms, serious bleeding, and cardiovascular events. Copaiba, an essential oil used topically, has potential but unproven benefits, with few to no side effects. Basic research supports its mechanisms of benefit, but human data are sparse and include 1 case series and 1 small RCT examining its benefits for another inflammatory condition, not IA. Providing effective and safe pain relief for patients with IA presents clinical, public health, and research challenges. The clinical challenge is to maximize the benefits of treatment and minimize its risks. Sales of copaiba are increasing and may continue to do so even in the absence of reliable evidence from RCTs, providing a public health challenge. Thus, the research challenge is to test topical copaiba versus a placebo for IA patients against a background of usual care in RCTs of sufficient size, dose, and duration. If such trials show positive results, a logical next step might be head-to-head comparisons against NSAIDs and COXIBs. Evidence from RCTs may support more widespread use or, to paraphrase Huxley, conclude that copaiba is yet another beautiful hypothesis slain by ugly facts.

Identifiers

PMID30881236
PMCPMC6413642
OpenAlexW2990107009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.