ReviewIntegrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.)2017
Treatments for Inflammatory Arthritis: Potential But Unproven Role of Topical Copaiba.
Review in Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Medicinal Plants for Acne Vulgaris: An Evidence-Based Review of Treatments Promoted by Social Media.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Akt3 Regulates the Tissue-Specific Response to Copaiba Essential Oil.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional medicines for inflammatory arthritis (IA) include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (COXIBs), which have variable clinical benefits and serious side effects. In large-scale randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) in IA, they have demonstrated significant decreases in pain and inflammation but also significant increases in gastrointestinal symptoms, serious bleeding, and cardiovascular events. Copaiba, an essential oil used topically, has potential but unproven benefits, with few to no side effects. Basic research supports its mechanisms of benefit, but human data are sparse and include 1 case series and 1 small RCT examining its benefits for another inflammatory condition, not IA. Providing effective and safe pain relief for patients with IA presents clinical, public health, and research challenges. The clinical challenge is to maximize the benefits of treatment and minimize its risks. Sales of copaiba are increasing and may continue to do so even in the absence of reliable evidence from RCTs, providing a public health challenge. Thus, the research challenge is to test topical copaiba versus a placebo for IA patients against a background of usual care in RCTs of sufficient size, dose, and duration. If such trials show positive results, a logical next step might be head-to-head comparisons against NSAIDs and COXIBs. Evidence from RCTs may support more widespread use or, to paraphrase Huxley, conclude that copaiba is yet another beautiful hypothesis slain by ugly facts.
Identifiers
30881236PMC6413642W2990107009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.