Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30881151›Full record

ReviewMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Connected drug delivery devices to complement drug treatments: potential to facilitate disease management in home setting.

Beate Bittner, Chantal Schmit Chiesi, Saifuddin Kharawala, Gavneet Kaur, Johannes Schmidt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Payer Perspectives on Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Administration of Drugs.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beate BittnerProduct Optimization, Global Product Strategy, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, 4070 Basel, Switzerland, beate.bittner@roche.com.
Chantal Schmit ChiesiProduct Optimization, Global Product Strategy, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, 4070 Basel, Switzerland, beate.bittner@roche.com.
Saifuddin KharawalaBridge Medical Consulting Ltd, Richmond, London, TW9 2SS, UK.
Gavneet KaurBridge Medical Consulting Ltd, Richmond, London, TW9 2SS, UK.
Johannes SchmidtProduct Optimization, Global Product Strategy, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, 4070 Basel, Switzerland, beate.bittner@roche.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Connected drug delivery devices are increasingly being developed to support patient supervision and counseling in home setting. Features may include dosing reminders, adherence trackers, tools for patient education, and patient diaries to collect patient-reported outcomes, as well as monitoring tools with interfaces between patients and health care professionals (HCPs). Five connected devices have been selected as the basis for a review of the clinical evidence concerning the impact of electronic tools on treatment adherence and efficacy outcomes. Disease areas covered include multiple sclerosis, diabetes, hypertension, liver and renal transplant recipients, tuberculosis, hepatitis C, clinically isolated syndrome, asthma, and COPD. From studies comparing the use of electronic feedback tools to standard of care, there is an initial evidence for a higher adherence to treatment and better outcomes among patients who use the electronic tools. To substantiate the assumption that connected devices can improve adherence in an outpatient setting over a prolonged period of time, further data from controlled randomized studies are required. Key barriers to the broader adoption of connected devices include data privacy laws that may prevent data sharing with HCPs in some countries, as well as the need to demonstrate that the tools are consistently used and generate a high-quality and reproducible database. If these challenges can be addressed in a way that is agreeable to all stakeholders, it is expected that the future value of connected devices will be to 1) facilitate and improve patient involvement in disease management in a flexible care setting, 2) enable early treatment decisions, and 3) complement value-based reimbursement models.

Indexed as

adherenceconnected drug delivery devicehome-administrationpatient-reported outcomesreal-world evidenceself-administration

Identifiers

PMID30881151
PMCPMC6419593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.