ReviewMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2019
Connected drug delivery devices to complement drug treatments: potential to facilitate disease management in home setting.
Review in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimising Paediatric Medication Adherence Through Innovative Drug Formulations and Delivery Systems.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Review
- Value, development challenges, and strategies for gaining internal endorsement of digitally connected subcutaneous drug delivery devices: a survey of pharmaceutical stakeholders.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Disease-Agnostic Electronic Adherence Aid for Subcutaneous at-Home and Self-Administration Devices-The Lowest Common Denominator Based on a Cross-Indication Survey.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Article
- Preferences and Perspectives of Specialist Multiple Sclerosis Nurses and Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Regarding the New RebiSmartMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Clinical Impact of Electronic Monitoring Devices of Inhalers in Adults with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Acceptability of and Willingness to Take Digital Pills by Patients, the Public, and Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Content Analysis of a Large Online Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Democratizing Global Health Care Through Scalable Emergent (Beyond the Mobile) Wireless Technologies.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Opportunities in an Evolving Pharmaceutical Development Landscape: Product Differentiation of Biopharmaceutical Drug Products.Pharmaceutical research · 2021Review
- Digital Health Integration Assessment and Maturity of the United States Biopharmaceutical Industry: Forces Driving the Next Generation of Connected Autoinjectable Devices.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Article
- Envisioning Post-pandemic Digital Neurological, Psychiatric and Mental Health Care.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
- Payer Perspectives on Intravenous versus Subcutaneous Administration of Drugs.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Connected drug delivery devices are increasingly being developed to support patient supervision and counseling in home setting. Features may include dosing reminders, adherence trackers, tools for patient education, and patient diaries to collect patient-reported outcomes, as well as monitoring tools with interfaces between patients and health care professionals (HCPs). Five connected devices have been selected as the basis for a review of the clinical evidence concerning the impact of electronic tools on treatment adherence and efficacy outcomes. Disease areas covered include multiple sclerosis, diabetes, hypertension, liver and renal transplant recipients, tuberculosis, hepatitis C, clinically isolated syndrome, asthma, and COPD. From studies comparing the use of electronic feedback tools to standard of care, there is an initial evidence for a higher adherence to treatment and better outcomes among patients who use the electronic tools. To substantiate the assumption that connected devices can improve adherence in an outpatient setting over a prolonged period of time, further data from controlled randomized studies are required. Key barriers to the broader adoption of connected devices include data privacy laws that may prevent data sharing with HCPs in some countries, as well as the need to demonstrate that the tools are consistently used and generate a high-quality and reproducible database. If these challenges can be addressed in a way that is agreeable to all stakeholders, it is expected that the future value of connected devices will be to 1) facilitate and improve patient involvement in disease management in a flexible care setting, 2) enable early treatment decisions, and 3) complement value-based reimbursement models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.