Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30881077›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental gastroenterology2019

Propofol sedation in colonoscopy: from satisfied patients to improved quality indicators.

Fadi Abu Baker, Amir Mari, Kamal Aamarney, Abu Ras Hakeem, Barouch Ovadia, Yael Kopelman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03922815 (Influence of Adequacy of Anaesthesia Monitoring on Both Operators' and Patients' Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopic Procedures), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03922815 nacompletednot on this map

Influence of Adequacy of Anaesthesia Monitoring on Both Operators' and Patients' Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopic Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of SilesiaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled158ConditionsColonic Diseases, FunctionalArmsrescue fentanyl, rescue propofol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adequacy of Anesthesia Guidance for Colonoscopy Procedures.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Is routine terminal ileum intubation justified during screening colonoscopy? Evidence from a regional screening program.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fadi Abu BakerGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, affiliated to the Ruth and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel, fa_fd@hotmail.com.
Amir MariGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, affiliated to the Ruth and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel, fa_fd@hotmail.com.
Kamal AamarneyPharmacy Services Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, affiliated to the Ruth and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel.
Abu Ras HakeemAnesthesiology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, affiliated to the Ruth and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel.
Barouch OvadiaGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, affiliated to the Ruth and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel, fa_fd@hotmail.com.
Yael KopelmanGastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, affiliated to the Ruth and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel, fa_fd@hotmail.com.
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPropofol-mediated sedation is safe and clearly associated with increased patient satisfaction. However, whether it results in a favorable effect on colonoscopy outcomes and performance compared to standard sedation with benzodiazepines/opiates remains unclear.

objectivesTo determine the effect of propofol-mediated sedation on colonoscopy-quality measures compared to traditional sedation.

methodsA large cohort of 44,794 patients who had undergone sedated colonoscopies were included. Colonoscopy-quality indicators were examined in benzodiazepine/opiate-sedated patients and compared with a propofol-mediated sedation group. Adjustment for potential confounders, such as age, sex, quality of bowel preparation, procedural setting, and indication was performed.

resultsPatients who received propofol-mediated sedation were more likely, and in a dose-dependent manner, to have an enhanced polyp-detection rate (22.8% vs 20.9%,

conclusionPropofol-mediated sedation during colonoscopy is associated with better examination performance and improved outcomes. Further prospective or randomized trials to support these findings are warranted.

Indexed as

cecal intubation ratecolonoscopypolyp-detection ratepropofol-mediated sedationquality indicators

Identifiers

PMID30881077
PMCPMC6396664
OpenAlexW2916986782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.