Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30880981›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2019

Synergistic antibacterial effect of ultrasound microbubbles combined with chitosan-modified polymyxin B-loaded liposomes on biofilm-producing

Yu-Ying Fu, Liang Zhang, Yi Yang, Cheng-Wei Liu, Ying-Na He, Pan Li, Xian Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biofilm · 2025
    Article
  8. Nanotechnology-driven nanoemulsion gel for enhanced transdermal delivery ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Ying FuPhase I Clinical Trial Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China, xiannyyu@outlook.com.
Liang ZhangChongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yi YangPhase I Clinical Trial Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China, xiannyyu@outlook.com.
Cheng-Wei LiuState Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Parasites, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ying-Na HeDepartment of Pharmacy, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China.
Pan LiChongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Molecular Imaging, Institute of Ultrasound Imaging, Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xian YuPhase I Clinical Trial Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China, xiannyyu@outlook.com.
Dalian Medical University · CNHebei University of Chinese Medicine · CNThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResistant strains of

methodsCLPs were prepared using a modified injection method, and microbubbles were prepared using a simple mechanical vibration method. Minimal biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) of CLPs against resistant biofilm-producing AB was determined. Antibacterial activities of CLPs with or without USMBs were analyzed by crystal violet staining and resazurin assays to evaluate biofilm mass and viable counts, respectively. Then, the anti-biofilm effects of CLPs with or without USMBs on biofilm-producing AB were confirmed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis.

resultsWe prepared CLPs that were 225.17±17.85 nm in size and carried positive charges of 12.64±1.44 mV. These CLPs, with higher encapsulation efficiency and drug loading, could exhibit a sustained release effect. We prepared microbubbles that were 2.391±0.052 µm in size and carried negative charges of -4.32±0.43 mV. The MBICs of the CLPs on the biofilm-producing AB was 8±2 µg/mL, while that of polymyxin B was 32±2 µg/mL. USMBs in combination with 2 µg/mL of polymyxin B could completely eliminate the biofilm-producing AB and achieve the maximum antimicrobial effects (

conclusionIn this research, we successfully prepared USMBs and CLPs that have a more significant antibacterial effect on biofilm-forming AB than polymyxin B alone. Experiments in vitro indicate that the synergistic antibacterial effect of combining USMBs with CLPs containing as little as 2 µg/mL of polymyxin B is sufficient to almost eliminate drug-resistant biofilm-producing AB.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesUltrasonicsAcinetobacter baumanniiAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsChitosanDrug LiberationDrug SynergismHumansLiposomesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymyxin BAnti-Bacterial AgentsChitosanLiposomesPolymyxin BAcinetobacter baumanniibiofilmschitosanliposomepolymyxin Bultrasound microbubbles

Identifiers

PMID30880981
PMCPMC6413752
OpenAlexW2921511477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.