Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30880922›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2019

A cross-sectional study to assess the difference in perception of day surgery information between patients and medical staff in China.

Xiaoqian Deng, Shuqing Liang, Hui Li, Divakara Gouda, Tao Zhu, Kun Xiao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploration of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture as day surgery: a retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoqian DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Shuqing LiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Hui LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Divakara GoudaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tao ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Kun XiaoSchool of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China, xiaokun@uestc.edu.cn.
Sichuan University · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe development of day surgery in China is still in its infancy. The aim of this study is to examine the difference in perception between patients and medical staff about day surgery and to find out what kind of information should be delivered to patients perioperatively.

methodsThe study was designed as a cross-sectional study using survey questionnaires. Patients undergoing day surgery and medical staff working in the day surgery center received a preoperative teaching questionnaire (PTQ). The PTQ consisted of preoperative, operative, postoperative and anesthesia information. Participants were asked to rate accurately what day surgery information they perceived as important on a five-point Likert-type scale that ranged from very important to not important. The main outcome was the value patients and staff place on perioperative information.

resultsFor patients, details of anesthesia (82.6%) was the most important day surgery information, while for medical staff, preoperative (58.1%), postoperative (60.7%) and anesthesia (60.0%) information were of the same importance. Patients ranked surgery effect (83.3%) and pain management (82.5%) as two of the top five most important details about day surgery, but these were not listed in the top 5 rankings of staff. Student's

conclusionIn China, day surgery is an emerging practice with both patients and medical practitioners still lacking experience, so high-quality perioperative teaching is necessary and important. Our study examining patients and staffs' views on day surgery information should be considered when developing perioperative teaching programs. To increase patient satisfaction of the day surgery experience, delivery of patient-specific information tailored to individual circumstances is necessary.

Indexed as

anesthesiaday surgerypain managementperceptionperioperative teaching

Identifiers

PMID30880922
PMCPMC6407508
OpenAlexW2918304562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.