Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30880900›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Large Hiatal Hernia Repair with Urinary Bladder Matrix Graft Reinforcement and Concomitant Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Kent C Sasse, Jonathan Gevorkian, Rachel Lambin, Rami Afshar, Amy Gardner, Aradhana Mehta, John-Henry Lambin, Austin Shinagawa

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kent C SasseK Sasse Surgical Associates, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Jonathan GevorkianK Sasse Surgical Associates, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Rachel LambinK Sasse Surgical Associates, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Rami AfsharK Sasse Surgical Associates, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Amy GardnerK Sasse Surgical Associates, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Aradhana MehtaReno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA.
John-Henry LambinK Sasse Surgical Associates, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Austin ShinagawaReno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA.
University of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no current consensus on the management of large hiatal hernias concomitant with performance of a sleeve gastrectomy procedure. Proposed solutions have included performing a modified Nissen fundoplication, performing cruroplasty alone, utilizing the Linx device, performing cruroplasty with reinforcement material, and avoiding the sleeve procedure altogether in favor of a bypass procedure in order to minimize gastroesophageal reflux. Urinary bladder matrix (UBM) represents a biologically derived material for use in hiatal hernia repair reinforcement with the potential to improve durability of repair without incurring the risks of other reinforcement materials.

methodsThis study reports the results of a retrospective chart review of 32 cases of large hiatal hernia repair utilizing both primary crural repair and UBM reinforcement concomitant with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy by a single surgeon. Hernia diameter averaged 6 cm (range 4-9 cm). After an average of 1 year followup, 30 patients were assessed for subjective symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) score. Twenty patients were evaluated with either upper gastrointestinal (GI) series, endoscopy, or both.

resultsEach repair was successful and completed laparoscopically concomitant with sleeve gastrectomy. Anterior and posterior cruroplasty was performed using interrupted 0-Ethibond suture using the Endostitch device. The UBM graft exhibited favorable handling characteristics placed as a keyhole geometry sutured to the crura with absorbable suture. A careful chart review was undertaken to assess for complications. There have been no reoperations. After a median of 12 months (range, 4-27 months) of followup, an assessment of recurrences or long-term complications was completed. Median GERD-HRQL score was 6, with a range of 0 to 64 (of possible 75), indicating very low-level reflux symptomatology. Follow-up upper GI radiographs or endoscopy were obtained in 20 cases and show intact repairs.

conclusionIn this series of 32 cases, laparoscopic cruroplasty with UBM graft reinforcement has been effective and durable at 12 months of followup. This technique may offer one satisfactory solution for large hiatal hernia repair concomitant with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy that may achieve a durable repair with low GERD symptoms.

Indexed as

SuturesAdultAgedFemaleGastrectomyGastroesophageal RefluxHernia, HiatalHerniorrhaphyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRecurrenceReoperationRetrospective StudiesGERDHiatal herniaSleeve GastrectomyUpper GI surgeryUrinary bladder matrix

Identifiers

PMID30880900
PMCPMC6408943
OpenAlexW2922458733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.