Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30880824›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2019

Update Breast Cancer 2019 Part 1 - Implementation of Study Results of Novel Study Designs in Clinical Practice in Patients with Early Breast Cancer.

Andreas D Hartkopf, Volkmar Müller, Achim Wöckel, Michael P Lux, Wolfgang Janni, Naiba Nabieva, Florin-Andrei Taran, Johannes Ettl, Diana Lüftner, Erik Belleville and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Update Breast Cancer 2020 Part 4 - Advanced Breast Cancer.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas D HartkopfDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Volkmar MüllerDepartment of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Achim WöckelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Michael P LuxErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Naiba NabievaErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Florin-Andrei TaranDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Johannes EttlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Diana LüftnerCharité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
Erik BellevilleClinSol GmbH & Co. KG, Würzburg, Germany.
Florian SchützDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter A FaschingErlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Tanja N FehmDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hans-Christian KolbergDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany.
Friedrich OverkampOncoConsult Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissNational Center for Tumor Diseases, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans TeschOncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DECardiovascular Center Bethanien · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEMarienhospital Bottrop · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many years, small but significant advancements have been made time and again in the prevention and treatment of early breast cancer. The so-called panel gene analyses are becoming more and more important in prevention, since the risk due to the tested genes is better understood and as a result, concepts for integration in health care can be developed. In the adjuvant situation, the first study in the so-called post-neoadjuvant situation was able to demonstrate a clear improvement in the prognosis with an absent pathological complete remission following trastuzumab or pertuzumab + trastuzumab. Additional studies with this post-neoadjuvant therapeutic concept are still being conducted at present. The CDK4/6 inhibitors which had shown a significant improvement in progression-free survival in a metastatic situation are currently being tested in the adjuvant situation in large therapeutic studies. These and other new data for the treatment or prevention of primary breast cancer are presented in this review against the backdrop of current studies.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapyearly breast cancerKatherineneoadjuvant therapypreventionT-DM1

Identifiers

PMID30880824
PMCPMC6414304
OpenAlexW2922080156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.