Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30880724›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Prospective, multicenter, observational study of tissue acquisition through EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy using a 25G Franseen needle.

Ryo Sugiura, Masaki Kuwatani, Kei Yane, Yoko Taya, Hideyuki Ihara, Manabu Onodera, Kazunori Eto, Itsuki Sano, Taiki Kudo, Tomoko Mitsuhashi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Patients' Knowledge About the Endoscopic UltrasoundGuided Fine Needle Aspiration of Pancreas Is Not Enough.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ryo SugiuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Masaki KuwataniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine; Division of Endoscopy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Kei YaneCenter for Gastroenterology, Teine-Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoko TayaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Hideyuki IharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Manabu OnoderaDepartment of Gastroenterology, NTT East Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Kazunori EtoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tomakomai City Hospital, Tomakomai, Japan.
Itsuki SanoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kushiro Rosai Hospital, Kushiro, Japan.
Taiki KudoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Japan.
Tomoko MitsuhashiDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Akio KatanumaCenter for Gastroenterology, Teine-Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Naoya SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hokkaido Interventional EUS/ERCP study (HONEST) group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) using a Franseen needle was developed for histological tissue acquisition. However, the yield of a 25G Franseen needle when acquiring histological core tissue has been unclear. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe performed a prospective, multicenter, and observational cohort study that included 100 solid lesions scheduled for EUS-FNB using a 25G Franseen needle at eight centers in Hokkaido, Japan. Only EUS-FNB specimens acquired at the first pass were evaluated without a rapid on-site evaluation. The tissue acquisition rate, acquisition rate of an adequate specimen for histological assessment, the quality of tissue sample, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy, and adverse events were evaluated.

resultsWe analyzed a total of 100 solid lesions in 100 patients. The patients were 57 males and 43 females with a median age of 70 years. The technical success rate was 100%. The tissue acquisition rate was 95.0%. The acquisition rate of an adequate specimen for histological assessment was 82.0%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy were 87.0%, 100%, 100%, 40.0%, and 88.0%, respectively. The adverse event rate was 1.0%, and it was reported in only one patient who had a moderate pancreatic fistula.

conclusionsEUS-FNB using the 25G Franseen needle was feasible, and adequate histological core tissue samples were acquired with this method.

Indexed as

EUSEUS-guided fine-needle biopsyFranseen needletissue acquisition

Identifiers

PMID30880724
PMCPMC6791109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.