Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30880722›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Drainage of the right liver under EUS guidance: A bridge technique allowing drainage of the right liver through the left liver into the stomach or jejunum.

Fabrice Caillol, Coline Bosshardt, Sylvia Reimao, Ellen Francioni, Christian Pesenti, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabrice CaillolEndoscopy Departement, Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Coline BosshardtEndoscopy Departement, Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Sylvia ReimaoEndoscopy Departement, Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Ellen FrancioniEndoscopy Departement, Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Christian PesentiEndoscopy Departement, Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Erwan BoriesEndoscopy Departement, Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Jean Philippe RatoneEndoscopy Departement, Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Marc GiovanniniEndoscopy Departement, Endoscopy Unit, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
Institut Paoli-Calmettes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveEUS-guided biliary drainage is now comparable to percutaneous drainage. This technique can be used in cases of complex drainage of the hilum, mainly for salvage therapy to drain the left liver. In cases of inaccessible papilla or altered anatomy, EUS-guided biliary drainage for hilar stenosis of the liver could be used as the first approach. However, this technique has limited applicability for the right liver. In this feasibility study, we reported drainage of the right liver using the bridge technique and hepaticogastrostomy. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective study was based on a prospective registry from January 2013 to February 2017. Patients with inaccessible papilla due to altered anatomy or duodenal invasion and drainage under EUS guidance and bridge technique without previous biliary drainage were included in the study. The bridge technique was used to place an uncovered biliary stent between the right and left liver. The left liver was drained with a hepaticogastrostomy.

resultsTwelve patients were included in the study. Stenosis was Type II for nine, IIIA for two, and Type IV for one patient. Technical and clinical success was 100% and 83%, respectively. Morbidity was 33% (four patients), including three with abdominal pain managed conservatively and one with a percutaneous salvage drainage. Postoperative mortality was 8% (uncontrolled sepsis). The mean survival was 6 months. Chemotherapy could be administered in 70% (seven) patients in cases of clinical success.

conclusionThe bridge technique under EUS guidance could be a first alternative for draining malignant hilar stenosis in cases of the inaccessible papilla.

Indexed as

Bridge techniqueEUS drainagehepaticogastrostomyhilar drainage

Identifiers

PMID30880722
PMCPMC6590001
OpenAlexW2920860093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.