Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30880645›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain.

Trevor T Perry, Peggy B Nelson, Dianne J Van Tasell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effectiveness of a Self-Fitting Tool for User-Driven Fitting of Hearing Aids.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Trevor T Perry1 Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2177-3091
Peggy B Nelson1 Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Dianne J Van Tasell1 Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Improving Amplification Outcomes in Noise by Self-Directed Hearing Aid FittingR01DC013267 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI NELSON, PEGGY B · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-adjustment of hearing aid gain can provide valuable information about the gain preferences of individual listeners, but these preferences are not well understood. Listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss used self-adjustment to select amplification gain and compression parameters in real time on a portable touch screen device while listening in quiet and noisy backgrounds. Adjustments to gain prescribed by the National Acoustics Laboratories' non-linear fitting procedure (NAL-NL2) showed large between-subject variability. Known listener characteristics (age, gender, hearing thresholds, hearing aid experience, acceptable noise level, and external ear characteristics) and listener engagement with the self-adjustment software were examined as potential predictors of this variability. Neither listener characteristics nor time spent adjusting gain were robust predictors of gain change from NAL-NL2. Listeners with less than 2 years of hearing aid experience and who also had better hearing thresholds tended to select less gain, relative to NAL-NL2, than experienced hearing aid users who had poorer thresholds. Listener factors explained no more than 10% of the between-subject variance in deviation from NAL-NL2, suggesting that modifying prescriptive fitting formulae based on the factors examined here would be unlikely to result in amplification parameters that are similar to user-customized settings. Self-adjustment typically took less than 3 min, indicating that listeners could use comparable technology without a substantial time commitment.

Indexed as

Loudness PerceptionProsthesis FittingSpeech PerceptionAgedFemaleHearingHearing AidsHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpeech Reception Threshold Testacclimatizationamplificationbackground noisehearing aid fittinghearing loss

Identifiers

PMID30880645
PMCPMC6423677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.