Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30880523›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2019

Is it necessary to correct a caesarean scar defect before a subsequent pregnancy? A report of three cases.

Piotr Szkodziak, Anna Stępniak, Piotr Czuczwar, Filip Szkodziak, Tomasz Paszkowski, Sławomir Woźniak

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Piotr Szkodziak3rd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3582-067X
Anna Stępniak3rd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Piotr Czuczwar3rd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Filip Szkodziak3rd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Tomasz Paszkowski3rd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Sławomir Woźniak3rd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates of caesarean section have increased over recent years and so too have associated complications, one of which is a caesarean scar defect (CSD). The defect may cause gynaecological symptoms, such as menometrorrhagia, infertility, chronic abdominal/pelvic pain or it may be asymptomatic. The presence of CSD may lead to obstetrical sequalae such as preterm delivery, uterine rupture, caesarean scar pregnancy or abnormal placenta implantation. Three cases of CSD are described here. In one case, surgical correction of the CSD was performed before a subsequent pregnancy with an uncomplicated obstetric outcome. In the other two cases, surgical correction of the CSD was not performed and the pregnancies were complicated by caesarean scar dehiscence and caesarean scar pregnancy. We suggest that women with a CSD may benefit from surgical correction of the defect before becoming pregnant to reduce the likelihood of serious complications.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionCicatrixFemaleHumansPregnancyCaesarean scar defectcaesarean scar pregnancycaesarean sectionmyometrial thicknessniche

Identifiers

PMID30880523
PMCPMC6567761
OpenAlexW2920852690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.