Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30880307›Full record

Observational studyNeurologia medico-chirurgica2019

Real-world Experience of Carotid Artery Stenting in Japan: Analysis of 8458 Cases from the JR-NET3 Nationwide Retrospective Multi-center Registries.

Ryo Tokuda, Shinichi Yoshimura, Kazutaka Uchida, Kiyofumi Yamada, Tetsu Satow, Koji Iihara, Nobuyuki Sakai, Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy (JR-NET) investigators

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryo TokudaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo College of Medicine.
Shinichi YoshimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo College of Medicine.
Kazutaka UchidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo College of Medicine.
Kiyofumi YamadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo College of Medicine.
Tetsu SatowDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center.
Koji IiharaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.
Nobuyuki SakaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital.
Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy (JR-NET) investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to clarify the outcomes of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the Japanese population. For this purpose, we reviewed data from the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy 3 (JR-NET3), a retrospective, nation-wide, multi-center, observational study of neuroendovascular treatments in Japan. Of the 9207 patients who underwent CAS between January 2010 and December 2014, 8458 satisfied the inclusion criteria for our analysis. The outcome statistics of this JR-NET3 cohort were compared to those of JR-NET1 and 2 cohorts fitting the same inclusion criteria. Of the 8458 JR-NET3 patients analyzed, 8042 (95.1%) were treated by surgeons with board certification from the Japanese Society for NeuroEndovascular Therapy. Technical success was achieved in 8417 patients (99.5%), whereas 198 patients (2.3%) had clinically significant complications (CSCs). These findings mirrored those obtained for the JR-NET1 and 2 cohorts. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for CAS-associated CSC included symptomatic lesion [odds ratio (OR), 1.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-3.00; P = 0.003] and hypoechoic lesion on carotid artery ultrasound (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.21-2.84; P = 0.005), whereas use of closed-cell stents was a predictor of better outcome (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.79; P = 0.002). The findings of JR-NET3 reflect good outcomes of CAS, but non-modifiable risk factors reflecting lesion characteristics remain of concern. Using closed-cell stents is advisable. Technological advances such as the introduction of new materials may help further improve CAS outcomes in Japanese patients.

Indexed as

StentsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarotid StenosisEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPostoperative ComplicationsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomePlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorscarotid artery stenosisregistry studystentingtreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID30880307
PMCPMC6465528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.