ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2020
Hybrid of Compressed Sensing and Parallel Imaging Applied to Three-dimensional Isotropic T
Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic utility of 3D MRI sequences in the assessment of central, recess and foraminal stenoses of the spine: a systematic review.Skeletal radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Accelerated 3D MR neurography of the brachial plexus using deep learning-constrained compressed sensing.European radiology · 2024Article
- Magnetic resonance shoulder imaging using deep learning-based algorithm.European radiology · 2023Article
- Comparison of compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE) accelerated 3D T2W TSE sequence versus conventional 3D and 2D T2W TSE sequences in rectal cancer: a prospective study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- Evaluating Compressed SENSE (CS) MRI Metal Artifact Reduction Using Pig L-Spine Phantom and Transplant Patients: Focused on the CS-SEMAC (SPIR), mDixon(O-MAR) and STIR Techniques.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- An Investigation of 2D Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with Compressed Sensing (CS).Skeletal radiology · 2022Article
- A narrative review of MRI acquisition for MR-guided-radiotherapy in prostate cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Review
- Image quality and acquisition time assessments for phase oversampling in compressed sensing sensitivity encoding: Comparison with conventional SENSE.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Combined signal averaging and compressed sensing: impact on quality of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D turbo field-echo imaging for pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Neuroradiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe hybrid compressed sensing (hybrid-CS) technique can shorten the acquisition time compared with the sensitivity encoding (SENSE) technique in lumbar MRI. To evaluate the feasibility of a hybrid-CS technique in comparison with 3D isotropic T MATERIALS AND
methodsThe Institutional Review Board approved this study and informed consent was obtained from participants prior to study entry. Sixteen healthy volunteers underwent lumbar spine 3D VISTA with conventional parallel imaging for SENSE and hybrid-CS at 3T. We recorded the image acquisition times of SENSE and hybrid-CS. We compared the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in spine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), lumbar disc, epidural fat, and erector spinae muscle, and the contrast of spine, CSF, and disc, and performed qualitative image analysis assessment, between the two image sequences.
resultsThe image acquisition time for hybrid-CS was 39.2% shorter than that of SENSE (218.4/358.8 s). The contrast of CSF and SNR of the spine was significantly higher with hybrid-CS than with SENSE (P < 0.05). The SNR of the disc and muscle was significantly higher with SENSE than with hybrid-CS (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the contrast of spine, disc, and fat, and SNR of CSF and fat between hybrid-CS and SENSE. There were no significant differences in the qualitative evaluation between hybrid-CS and SENSE.
conclusionCompared with SENSE, hybrid-CS for 3D VISTA can shorten image acquisition time without sacrificing image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.