Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30880166›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteomics2019

Label-free absolute protein quantification with data-independent acquisition.

Bing He, Jian Shi, Xinwen Wang, Hui Jiang, Hao-Jie Zhu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An in vitro evaluation of common botanical extracts on carboxylesterase 1 catalytic activity.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proteomic Profile of Flaxseed (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bing HeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
Jian ShiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
Xinwen WangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
Hui JiangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America.
Hao-Jie ZhuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States of America. Electronic address: hjzhu@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Tissue/InformaticsP50CA186786 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Robert Timothy Dess · 2014 to 2026
$27.6M
Carboxylesterase 1 Genetic Variation and Methylphenidate in ADHDR01HD093612 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MARKOWITZ, JOHN S, ZHU, HAOJIE · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Genetic determinants of ACEI prodrug activationR01HL126969 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHU, HAOJIE · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186786NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126969NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite data-independent acquisition (DIA) has been increasingly used for relative protein quantification, DIA-based label-free absolute quantification method has not been fully established. Here we present a novel DIA method using the TPA algorithm (DIA-TPA) for the absolute quantification of protein expressions in human liver microsomal and S9 samples. To validate this method, both data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and DIA experiments were conducted on 36 individual human liver microsome and S9 samples. The MS2-based DIA-TPA was able to quantify approximately twice as many proteins as the MS1-based DDA-TPA method, whereas protein concentrations determined by the two approaches were comparable. To evaluate the accuracy of the DIA-TPA method, we absolutely quantified carboxylesterase 1 concentrations in human liver S9 fractions using an established SILAC internal standard-based proteomic assay; the SILAC results were consistent with those obtained from DIA-TPA analysis. Finally, we employed a unique algorithm in DIA-TPA to distribute the MS signals from shared peptides to individual proteins or isoforms and successfully applied the method to the absolute quantification of several drug-metabolizing enzymes in human liver microsomes. In sum, the DIA-TPA method not only can absolutely quantify entire proteomes and specific proteins, but also has the capability quantifying proteins with shared peptides. SIGNIFICANCE: Data independent acquisition (DIA) has emerged as a powerful approach for relative protein quantification at the whole proteome level. However, DIA-based label-free absolute protein quantification (APQ) method has not been fully established. In the present study, we present a novel DIA-based label-free APQ approach, named DIA-TPA, with the capability absolutely quantifying proteins with shared peptides. The method was validated by comparing the quantification results of DIA-TPA with that obtained from stable isotope-labeled internal standard-based proteomic assays.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleHumansMaleMicrosomes, LiverMiddle AgedAbsolute protein quantificationData dependent acquisitionData independent acquisitionLivers

Identifiers

PMID30880166
PMCPMC6533198
OpenAlexW2922042339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.