Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30879706›Full record

ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2020

Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Deep Brain Stimulation on Voice and Speech in Patients With Dystonia.

Mary E Finger, Mustafa S Siddiqui, Amy K Morris, Kathryn W Ruckart, S Carter Wright, Ihtsham U Haq, Lyndsay L Madden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Voice and Speech in Deep Brain Stimulation in Dystonia: A Retrospective Study, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Speech Intelligibility in Speakers With Adductor Laryngeal Dystonia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary E FingerDepartments of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Mustafa S SiddiquiDepartments of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Amy K MorrisDepartments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Kathryn W RuckartDepartments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
S Carter WrightDepartments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Ihtsham U HaqDepartments of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Lyndsay L MaddenDepartments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Electronic address: lmadden@wakehealth.edu.
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effects of globus pallidus interna (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on speech and voice quality of patients with primary, medically refractory dystonia.

methodsVoices of 14 patients aged ≥18 years (males = 7 and females = 7) with primary dystonia (DYT1 gene mutation dystonia = 4, cervical dystonia = 6, and generalized dystonia = 4) with bilateral GPi DBS were assessed. Five blinded raters (two fellowship-trained laryngologists and three speech/language pathologists) evaluated audio recordings of each patient pre- and post-DBS. Perceptual voice quality was rated using the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain scale and changes in speech intelligibility were assessed with the Clinical Global Impression scale of Severity instrument. Inter-rater and intrarater reliability rates for perceptual voice ratings were assessed using the kappa coefficient.

resultsVoice quality parameters showed mean improvements in Grade (P < 0.0001), Roughness (P = 0.0043), and Strain (P < 0.0001) 12 months post-DBS. Asthenia increased from baseline to 6 months (P = 0.0022) and declined significantly from 6 to 12 months (P = 0.0170). Breathiness did not change significantly over time. Speech intelligibility also improved from 6 to 12 months (P = 0.0202) and from pre-DBS to 12 months post-DBS (P = 0.0022). Grade and Strain ratings had nearly perfect and substantial inter-rater agreement (0.84 and 0.71, respectively).

conclusionsVoice and speech intelligibility improved after bilateral GPi DBS for dystonia. GPi DBS may emerge as a potential treatment option for patients with medically refractory laryngeal dystonia.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationSpeech AcousticsVoice QualityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDysphoniaDystoniaFemaleGlobus PallidusHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesSpeech IntelligibilityDeep Brain StimulationGlobus Pallidus InternaPrimary dystoniaSpeechVoice

Identifiers

PMID30879706
PMCPMC6745002
OpenAlexW2920901352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.