Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30879377›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Coronary Calcium Characteristics as Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Symptomatic Patients: Insights From the CORE 320 Multinational Study.

Mallory S Lo-Kioeng-Shioe, Andrea L Vavere, Armin Arbab-Zadeh, Joanne D Schuijf, Carlos E Rochitte, Marcus Y Chen, Matthias Rief, Klaus F Kofoed, Melvin E Clouse, Arthur J Scholte and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Automated cardiovascular risk categorization through AI-driven coronary calcium quantification in cardiac PET acquired attenuation correction CT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Performance of visual, manual, and automatic coronary calcium scoring of cardiacJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  12. The novel HFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Subclinical cardiovascular disease and utility of coronary artery calcium score.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mallory S Lo-Kioeng-Shioe1 Department of Cardiology Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Andrea L Vavere1 Department of Cardiology Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Armin Arbab-Zadeh1 Department of Cardiology Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Joanne D Schuijf3 Toshiba Medical Systems Europe BV Zoetermeer the Netherlands.
Carlos E Rochitte4 Department of Cardiology InCor Heart Lung and Blood Institute University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.
Marcus Y Chen5 National Heart Lung and Blood Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD.
Matthias Rief6 Department of Radiology Charité Medical School Humboldt Berlin, Germany.
Klaus F Kofoed7 Department of Cardiology Heart Center University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Melvin E Clouse8 Department of Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard University Boston MA.
Arthur J Scholte9 Department of Cardiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands.
Julie M Miller1 Department of Cardiology Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Aisha Betoko10 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD.
Michael J Blaha1 Department of Cardiology Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Christopher Cox10 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD.
Jaap W Deckers2 Department of Cardiology Erasmus Medical Center Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam the Netherlands.
Joao A C Lima1 Department of Cardiology Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine Baltimore MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The predictive value of coronary artery calcium ( CAC ) has been widely studied; however, little is known about specific characteristics of CAC that are most predictive. We aimed to determine the independent associations of Agatston score, CAC volume, CAC area, CAC mass, and CAC density score with major adverse cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Methods and Results A total of 379 symptomatic participants, aged 45 to 85 years, referred for invasive coronary angiography, who underwent coronary calcium scanning and computed tomography angiography as part of the CORE 320 (Combined Noninvasive Coronary Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using 320 Detector Computed Tomography) study, were included. Agatston score, CAC volume, area, mass, and density were computed on noncontrast images. Stenosis measurements were made on contrast-enhanced images. The primary outcome of 2-year major adverse cardiac events (30 revascularizations [>182 days of index catheterization], 5 myocardial infarctions, 1 cardiac death, 9 hospitalizations, and 1 arrhythmia) occurred in 32 patients (8.4%). Associations were estimated using multivariable proportional means models. Median age was 62 (interquartile range, 56-68) years, 34% were women, and 56% were white. In separate models, the Agatston, volume, and density scores were all significantly associated with higher risk of major adverse cardiac events after adjustment for age, sex, race, and statin use; density was the strongest predictor in all CAC models. CAC density did not provide incremental value over Agatston score after adjustment for diameter stenosis, age, sex, and race. Conclusions In symptomatic patients, CAC density was the strongest independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events among CAC scores, but it did not provide incremental value beyond the Agatston score after adjustment for diameter stenosis.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCalciumComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPredictive Value of TestsCalciumcalcium densitycardiac computed tomographycoronary artery calciumcoronary artery diseaseprognosis

Identifiers

PMID30879377
PMCPMC6475072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.