ReviewAdvances in therapy2019
The Case for the Use of Patient and Caregiver Perception of Change Assessments in Rare Disease Clinical Trials: A Methodologic Overview.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Patient-reported outcomes in Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of moral reasons on orphan drug reimbursement.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Patients' experience with and perspectives on long-term use of continuous subcutaneous infusion of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Caregiver Meaningful Score Differences and Meaningful Score Regions for the Observer-Reported Communication Ability Measure for Individuals with Angelman Syndrome.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2026Article
- Recommendations for the use of clinical outcome assessments in rare disease drug development.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Establishing a core outcome set for creatine transporter deficiency and guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Patient Experience of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease: Qualitative Patient and Clinician Interviews Informing the Development of a Conceptual Model.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- RD-LIVES: A Living Evidence Synthesis System for Rare Disease Treatment Efficacy and Safety.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluating meaningful changes in physical functioning and cognitive declines in metachromatic leukodystrophy: a caregiver interview study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Study design challenges and strategies in clinical trials for rare diseases: Lessons learned from pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Innovations in Therapy Development for Rare Diseases Through the Rare Disease Cures Accelerator-Data and Analytics Platform.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022Article
- Article
- The involvement of rare disease patient organisations in therapeutic innovation across rare paediatric neurological conditions: a narrative review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Review
- Patient Experience Data for Medical Product Development: Opportunity Beyond Obligation.The patient · 2022Article
- A survey of registered pharmacological clinical trials on rare neurological diseases in children in 2010-2020.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Patient-Focused Drug Development Initiative: Experience with Integration of Patient-Experience Data in a New Drug Application for Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant for Treatment-Resistant Depression.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022Article
- The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rare Diseases and Implications for Health Technology Assessment.The patient · 2021Review
- Therapies for rare diseases: therapeutic modalities, progress and challenges ahead.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe traditional model of evaluating treatments based primarily on primary outcome measures has stumbled in its application to rare disease. Rare disease clinical trials face the methodological challenges of small, heterogeneous patient populations and relatively few validated, disease-specific outcome measures. Incorporating qualitative research into rare disease clinical trials may help sponsors, regulators, payers, and prescribers to better understand the real-world and patient-specific impact of a potential therapy. This paper provides a methodologic overview of the use of Patient and Caregiver Perception of Change (PPC and CPC) Assessments utilizing patient and caregiver video interviews to complement the data captured by traditional endpoints in rare disease clinical trials.
methodsIncorporating qualitative patient and caregiver video interviews into clinical trials allows for the rigorous capture of patient experiences and caregiver observations. Interview guides informed by input from key stakeholders provide the opportunity to solicit structured feedback on experiences before, during, and after the clinical trial. Patients and caregivers can complete their video interviews in a study mobile application, and interview transcripts are analyzed by independent coders. Themes are summarized by the treatment group and individual patient, which adds context to the clinical outcome measures of how patients feel and function, as well as elucidates the degree of change that is meaningful to patients and caregivers. The qualitative results can be compared to the data captured in clinical trials to assess data concordance.
conclusionCapturing patient experience data with sufficient rigor allows it to contribute to the body of evidence utilized in regulatory, payer, and prescriber decision-making. Adding PPC and CPC Assessments to rare disease clinical trials offers an innovative and powerful way to tap into the unique insights of patients and their families to develop a fuller picture of the patient experience in the clinical trial.
fundingStealth BioTherapeutics Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.